Search Results for "legal malafide"

1123 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1123 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for BAPS Temple Construction — Acquisition Upheld as Valid Public Purpose Under MRTP Act, 1966. Petitioners lacked locus standi and filed petition after 10-year delay, leading to dismissal.

The petitioners, Mr. Salim Naim Khan and Mrs. Reshma Salim Khan, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of land by the State of Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Buyer in Scrap Sale Contract Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Court Restrains Seller from Selling Scrap to Third Parties Pending Arbitration, Holding Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience in Favor of Buyer.

The petitioner, Chetan Iron LLP, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim measures pending arbi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Golf Course Construction in CRZ Area. Court holds that the subject land is not within CRZ limits based on the approved CRZ map, and the petitioner failed to establish any illegality in the permissions granted.

The petitioner, Sunil Sureshchandra Agarwal, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices and Order in Cenvat Credit Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Recovery of Central Excise Duty for Periods 2007-2008 Barred by Limitation as Notices Issued After Unreasonable Delay of Over 13 Years.

The Petitioner, Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging five show cause notices issued between 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Amendment of Plaint in Property Suit — No New Case Introduced. Amendment to incorporate subsequent events and clarify pleadings is permissible under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as it does not change the nature of the suit.

The petitioner, defendant no.1 in a civil suit, challenged an order dated 30.08.2021 passed by the 2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Nanded, allo...