Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Buyer in Scrap Sale Contract Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Court Restrains Seller from Selling Scrap to Third Parties Pending Arbitration, Holding Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience in Favor of Buyer.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Chetan Iron LLP, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim measures pending arbitration against the respondent, NRC Ltd. The dispute arose from a contract dated 21 September 2021 for the sale of scrap materials, including reinforcement steel, structural steel, stainless steel, and aluminum. The contract was on an 'as is where is basis' and 'ground clearance basis', with a validity up to 30 June 2022. On 26 October 2021, the parties added a note limiting non-plant and machinery items to 200 MT. The petitioner alleged that the respondent prevented it from lifting scrap and threatened to sell the scrap to third parties, thereby breaching the contract. The petitioner sought an injunction restraining the respondent from selling the scrap to others and a direction to allow lifting. The respondent contended that the petitioner failed to lift scrap as per the contract and that the contract was terminated. The court, after considering the submissions, found that the petitioner had made out a prima facie case and that the balance of convenience was in favor of granting interim relief to preserve the subject matter of the arbitration. The court directed the respondent to allow the petitioner to lift the scrap as per the contract and restrained the respondent from selling the scrap to third parties pending the arbitral proceedings.

Headnote

A) Arbitration - Interim Measures - Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Prima Facie Case - Dispute arose from a scrap sale contract where respondent allegedly prevented petitioner from lifting scrap and threatened to sell to third parties - Court held that petitioner made out a prima facie case and balance of convenience was in favor of granting interim relief to protect the subject matter of arbitration (Paras 1-24).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, restraining the respondent from selling the contracted scrap to third parties and allowing the petitioner to lift the scrap pending arbitration.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and granted interim relief, directing the respondent to allow the petitioner to lift the scrap as per the contract and restraining the respondent from selling the scrap to third parties pending the arbitral proceedings.

Law Points

  • Interim measures under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • 1996
  • Contractual interpretation of 'as is where is basis' and 'ground clearance basis'
  • Prima facie case and balance of convenience
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (01) 54

Arbitration Petition (L) No. 1366 of 2022

2022-01-24

G.S. Kulkarni

Mr. Anupam Surve, Mr. Shahbaz Khan Pathan, Mr. Abhinandan M. Waghmare for petitioner; Mr. Vikram Nankani (Senior Advocate), Mr. Summet Nankani, Mr. Prashant Asher, Mr. Naishadh Bhatia for respondent

Chetan Iron LLP

NRC Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim measures pending arbitration.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought an injunction restraining the respondent from selling the contracted scrap to third parties and a direction to allow the petitioner to lift the scrap.

Filing Reason

Respondent allegedly prevented petitioner from lifting scrap and threatened to sell to third parties, breaching the contract.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the respondent breached the contract by preventing lifting of scrap and threatening to sell to third parties. Respondent contended that the petitioner failed to lift scrap as per contract and that the contract was terminated.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, interim measures can be granted to protect the subject matter of arbitration if the applicant makes out a prima facie case and the balance of convenience is in favor of granting such relief.

Judgment Excerpts

This is a petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short “the Act”) whereby the petitioner has prayed for interim measures pending the arbitral proceedings. The dispute between the parties has arisen under a contract for sale of scrap dated 21 September 2021 titled as “Scrap Sale Order” (for short ‘the contract’), issued by the respondent in favour of the petitioner, interalia for a sale of scrap material...

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Arbitration Petition (L) No. 1366 of 2022 under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the Bombay High Court. The petition was reserved on 20 January 2022 and pronounced on 24 January 2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 9
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Buyer in Scrap Sale Contract Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Court Restrains Seller from Selling Scrap to Third Parties Pending Arbitration, Holding Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience in...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Lower Courts. Family Arrangement and Benami Transaction Allegations Rejected as Property Purchased by Deceased from Own Earnings and Joint Family Income.