Search Results for "advocate withdrawal"

1981 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1981 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Succession Act Proceeding — Section 41(b) of Specific Relief Act Not a Bar to Injunction Under Section 383 of Indian Succession Act, 1925

The case involves an appeal against an interim injunction order passed by the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Yavatmal, in M.J.C. No. 40 of 2014. The appellant,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Ban Order Against Contractor in ONGC Project Delay Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice. Enquiry Officer's Report Not Furnished to Contractor Before Imposing Ban, Rendering Order Arbitrary and Unreasonable Under Article 14.

The petitioner, Sarku Engineering Services SDN BHD, a Malaysian company, challenged an order dated 4 January 2016 issued by Respondent No.2, Oil and N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Ban Order Against Contractor in ONGC Project Delay Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice. Internal Enquiry Report Not Shared With Contractor Before Imposing Business Ban, Rendering Order Arbitrary and Unreasonable.

The petitioner, Sarku Engineering Services SDN BHD, a Malaysian company, challenged an order dated 4 January 2016 issued by respondent No.2, Oil and N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal as Withdrawn in Partition Suit — Court Permits Refund of Court Fees. Appellant sought withdrawal of Regular First Appeal against dismissal of suit for declaration and partition; court allowed withdrawal and directed refund of entire fees paid.

The appellant, Smt. Jayamma, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes Habeas Corpus Petition as Withdrawn After Detainee's Release. The court allowed withdrawal after the State confirmed the alleged detainee was secured and had gone with his parents.

The petitioner, Sri. C. Venkateshappa, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of habeas corpus directing ...