High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal as Withdrawn in Partition Suit — Court Permits Refund of Court Fees. Appellant sought withdrawal of Regular First Appeal against dismissal of suit for declaration and partition; court allowed withdrawal and directed refund of entire fees paid.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 74
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Smt. Jayamma, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 13.03.2019 passed by the V Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore, in O.S.No.4585/2012, which dismissed her suit for declaration and partition. The appellant was represented by Smt. B.V. Vidyulatha. The respondents were Smt. C. Pramila, Smt. C. Kamala, and Smt. Nagarathna, all daughters of late M.R. Cheluvaiah. During the hearing of the appeal, the appellant's counsel filed a memo dated 08.06.2020 seeking to withdraw the appeal. The court took the memo on record and dismissed the Regular First Appeal as withdrawn. Additionally, the court directed the registry to refund the entire court fees paid by the appellant, relying on the decision in Mr.K.S.Periaswamy Vs. State of Karnataka reported in ILR 2019 KAR 4195. The judgment was delivered by the Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri on 03.07.2020.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Withdrawal of Appeal - Dismissal as Withdrawn - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 - Appellant filed a memo to withdraw the Regular First Appeal against the judgment and decree dismissing the suit for declaration and partition - Court took the memo on record and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn - Held that the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn (Para 1).

B) Court Fees - Refund of Court Fees - Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 - Appellant sought refund of entire fees paid - Court directed refund in terms of the decision in Mr.K.S.Periaswamy Vs. State of Karnataka reported in ILR 2019 KAR 4195 - Held that the entire fees paid by the appellant be refunded (Para 1).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn and whether court fees should be refunded.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Regular First Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Registry is directed to refund the entire fees paid by the appellant in terms of the decision in Mr.K.S.Periaswamy Vs. State of Karnataka reported in ILR 2019 KAR 4195.

Law Points

  • Withdrawal of appeal
  • refund of court fees
  • memo for withdrawal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (07) 75

RFA NO.1521/2019 (PAR/DEC)

2020-07-03

P.B. Bajanthri

Smt. B.V. Vidyulatha

Smt. Jayamma

Smt. C. Pramila, Smt. C. Kamala, Smt. Nagarathna

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Regular First Appeal against dismissal of suit for declaration and partition.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to withdraw the appeal and refund of court fees.

Filing Reason

Appellant filed a memo to withdraw the appeal.

Previous Decisions

The trial court dismissed the suit for declaration and partition in O.S.No.4585/2012 on 13.03.2019.

Issues

Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn. Whether court fees should be refunded.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant's counsel filed a memo dated 08.06.2020 to withdraw the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

An appellant is entitled to withdraw an appeal at any stage, and upon withdrawal, the court may dismiss the appeal as withdrawn. Further, court fees may be refunded in accordance with applicable law and precedent.

Judgment Excerpts

Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 08.06.2020 to withdraw the Regular First Appeal. Memo is taken on record. Accordingly, the RFA is dismissed as withdrawn. Registry is directed to refund the entire fees paid by the appellant in terms of decision passed in the case of Mr.K.S.Periaswamy Vs. State of Karnataka reported in ILR 2019 KAR 4195.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a suit for declaration and partition in O.S.No.4585/2012 before the V Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore, which was dismissed on 13.03.2019. Aggrieved, the appellant filed the present Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 CPC. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant filed a memo to withdraw the appeal, which was allowed on 03.07.2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 96, Order XLI Rule 1
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Interest on Refund Under Section 214 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Held That Interest Is Mandatory and Must Be Paid on Entire Refund Amount from Date of Payment of Advance Tax.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal as Withdrawn in Partition Suit — Court Permits Refund of Court Fees. Appellant sought withdrawal of Regular First Appeal against dismissal of suit for declaration and partition; court allowed withdrawal and ...