Search Results for "Conclusive evidence"

2749 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2749 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction to Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. The court restrained the defendant from using deceptively similar 'PRINCE' and crown device marks for PVC pipes, finding a strong prima facie case of infringement and passing off.

The plaintiff, Prince Pipes and Fittings Ltd., a Mumbai-based company, has been using the mark 'PRINCE' and a 'crown device' since 1987 for manufactur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Golf Course Construction in CRZ Area. Court holds that the subject land is not within CRZ limits based on the approved CRZ map, and the petitioner failed to establish any illegality in the permissions granted.

The petitioner, Sunil Sureshchandra Agarwal, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee's Invalidating Orders in Koli Mahadev Tribe Certificate Cases. Committee Failed to Consider Relevant Documents and Applied Incorrect Burden of Proof, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioners, Abhishek Mahendra Umbarje, Dhiren Rajesh Umbarje, and Chandrakant Raghunath Umbarje, filed separate writ petitions challenging the de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Decree on Admission in Construction Contract Dispute — Plaintiff Entitled to Claim Amount Based on Defendant's Admissions. Unequivocal Admission of Liability Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC Leads to Decree for Final Bill Amount with Interest.

The plaintiff, a partnership firm, filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,07,88,000/- with interest against the defendant, a government-owned company, for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Orders in Customs Duty Under-Invoicing Case. Settlement Commission's Rejection of Settlement Application Upheld as Proper Exercise of Discretion Under Section 127H of Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, M/s Paul Industries, imported electronic goods during 1995-96 and was issued a show cause notice on 11th June 1999 by the Directorate ...