Search Results for "understanding consequences"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "understanding consequences"

1202 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1202 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Title Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Will Execution Not Proved as Attesting Witnesses Not Examined Under Section 68 of Evidence Act, 1872.

31 Jan 2020

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs against the judgment and decree of the lower appellate court in Regular Civil Appea...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Debt. Complainant failed to establish legally enforceable debt or liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as the cheque was given as security for a business transaction.

2 Mar 2020

The case involves an appeal by the complainant, Shankar Jaganath Mane, against the acquittal of the accused, Sikkandar Mohammed Bidiwala, for an offen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Coastal Zone Violation Orders Due to Alternative Remedy Under NGT Act. Petitioners failed to establish pre-1991 construction and could not bypass statutory appeal under Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010.

30 Jul 2020

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Prasad Naik and Rosalina de Souza against orders of the Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority (GCZMA...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Lease Dispute — Finds Perversity in Force Majeure Finding. Court holds that the Arbitrator's conclusion that the lessee's termination was not under the force majeure clause was perverse, but upholds other findings on delayed approvals and property tax dues.

19 Oct 2020

The case arises from a lease deed dated 1st August 2013 between Reliable Spaces Pvt Ltd (the Petitioner/Lessor) and Evonik India Pvt Ltd (the Responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Advocate in Sexual Harassment Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Case Under Section 354A IPC. Mere sending of messages and a proposal without physical contact or explicit demand for sexual favour does not constitute sexual harassment under the Indian Penal Code.

2 Dec 2020

The petitioner, an advocate, sought quashing of FIR No.570 of 2019 registered at Cidco Police Station, Aurangabad, under Sections 354A, 354D, 506, 509...

High Court

High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delay in Filing FIR — Consent Established by Victim's Own Testimony and Conduct. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove rape under Section 376 IPC and cheating under Section 417 IPC as the victim was a consenting party and the relationship was consensual.

16 Apr 2025

The appellant, A.R. Jayakumar, was convicted by the 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chikmagalur, in Sessions Case No.126/2009 for offences...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lok Adalat Order in Death Certificate Correction Case — Holds That Lok Adalat Cannot Adjudicate Disputed Facts Under Section 20 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. The court ruled that a dispute regarding the correctness of a death certificate requires adjudication by a civil court or appropriate authority, not a Lok Adalat.

27 May 2025

The petitioners, legal representatives of the deceased Sri Siddalingaiah, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Indi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes 75% Deposit Condition in Arbitration Award Stay — Section 36(2) of Arbitration Act Does Not Mandate Pre-Deposit. Court holds that Section 36(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not impose a mandatory pre-deposit condition for stay of an arbitral award, and the trial court erred in imposing 75% deposit without considering the petitioner's financial hardship.

7 Aug 2025

The petitioner, ITI Limited, challenged an order dated 19.04.2025 passed by the LXXXIII Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge (Commercial Court), Bengal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Levy of Mathadi Act Wages and Cess on Public Sector Undertaking. Loading/Unloading Operations at Factory Held to be Scheduled Employment Under Section 2(11) of Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969.

19 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Rashtriya Chemical & Fertilizers Limited, a Central Government Public Sector Undertaking engaged in manufacturing and marketing chemic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Section 80IA Deduction Case for Container Handling Cranes. Leasing of cranes to JNPT does not constitute developing, maintaining and operating an infrastructural facility under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

15 Feb 2010

The case involves appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal f...

91 92 93 94 95

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)