Search Results for "regulatory jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "regulatory jurisdiction"

1206 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1206 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in MHADA Redevelopment Case Upholding High Court's Decision on Writ Petition Maintainability. Court Finds No Interference with Contractual Rights as Agreements Were Unregistered and MHADA Had Authority Under Regulation 33(9) of Development Control and Promotion Regulations, 2034 to Issue E-Tender for Private Land Redevelopment.

16 Apr 2025

The dispute arose from an e-tender issued by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) for the redevelopment of a privately owned...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench the Question Whether Mere Membership of a Banned Organization is Punishable Under Section 10 of UAPA, 1967 — Earlier Decisions in Arup Bhuyan and Raneef Holding That Mere Membership Does Not Incriminate Without Violence or Incitement Are Reconsidered as Union of India Was Not Heard.

24 Mar 2023

This judgment arises from a reference to a larger Bench of the Supreme Court of India, questioning the correctness of the decisions in Arup Bhuyan v. ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Commission Order Directing Builder to Refund Amount with Interest in Flat Possession Delay Case. Builder's Appeal Dismissed as Subsequent Purchaser Entitled to Interest from Deposit Dates Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Despite Force Majeure Claims.

22 Jul 2021

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by the purchaser against the builder for delayed possession of a residential flat. The original allo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Notice for Unauthorized Commercial Construction Under Section 260(1) of MMC Act. Petitioner failed to produce any construction permission or approved plans for hotel, bakery, and other commercial units, leading to dismissal of writ petition.

15 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Sakib Ayub Khan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 21 February 2023 issu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging NOC Requirement for Construction Near Naval Area. Court holds that the requirement of NOC from Naval authorities for construction within 500 meters of naval installation is valid and not arbitrary.

27 Sep 2023

The petitioners, Dolby Builders Private Ltd. and its shareholder Girish Agarwal, filed a writ petition challenging the requirement of a No Objection C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows SEBI's Appeal Against Interim Order Restraining Adjudication Proceedings. Civil Suit Against SEBI Held Not Maintainable Due to Alternative Remedy Under SEBI Act, 1992.

21 Mar 2022

The case involves an appeal by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) against an interim order passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay High ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Permission for Alteration of Open Spaces in Housing Project — Open Spaces Sanctioned in Approved Layout Cannot Be Reduced Under Guise of Surplus Area. The Court held that purchasers of plots have a right to the open spaces as shown in the approved layout, and any deviation requires fresh approval and consent of all affected parties.

30 Sep 2022

The petitioners, residents and plot owners of the project 'Aldeia de Goa' at Bambolim, challenged the permission/NOC dated 11.12.2020 granted by the D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Rejection of Arbitration Petitions in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Holds That Non-Signatories Can Be Referred to Arbitration Under Group of Companies Doctrine. The court applied the group of companies doctrine to refer non-signatory appellants to arbitration, finding that they were closely connected to the signatory broker and the transactions were indivisible.

7 Apr 2021

The case involves four appeals filed by members of the Madgavkar family (Anil V. Madgavkar, Celsa A. Madgavkar, Ayesha A. Madgavkar, and Aakash A. Mad...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Rule 6 of Karnataka Human Rights Courts Rules, 2006 in Writ Petition Challenging Its Constitutional Validity. Rule 6 requiring prior sanction for prosecution of public servants under Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 is held intra vires and not inconsistent with the Act.

17 Jul 2025

The petitioners, nine police officers from Vijayapura, Karnataka, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Dispute Between Bhartiya Samruddhi Finance Ltd. and State of Maharashtra. Court holds that disputes arising from a contract containing an arbitration clause are arbitrable and appoints arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Bhartiya Samruddhi Finance Ltd., filed an arbitration petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking...

90 91 92 93 94

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)