Bombay High Court Quashes Permission for Alteration of Open Spaces in Housing Project — Open Spaces Sanctioned in Approved Layout Cannot Be Reduced Under Guise of Surplus Area. The Court held that purchasers of plots have a right to the open spaces as shown in the approved layout, and any deviation requires fresh approval and consent of all affected parties.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, residents and plot owners of the project 'Aldeia de Goa' at Bambolim, challenged the permission/NOC dated 11.12.2020 granted by the Deputy Town Planner (Respondent No.2) to the developer (Respondent No.4) for deviation/alteration in the final approved sub-division layout. The permission allowed deletion of 9,384 sq. mts of open space from the earlier approved plan for commercial/residential use. The petitioners purchased plots in Phase I (2004 approved plan) and Phase II (2007 approved plan) and constructed houses accordingly. In 2010, the developer applied for amalgamation of Phase I and II, maintaining the open spaces as originally shown. The court framed the issue whether originally sanctioned open spaces, on the basis of which plots were sold, can be altered under the garb that some area above the required 15% was available. The court held that open spaces shown in the approved plan are integral to the layout and cannot be reduced or altered to the detriment of plot owners who purchased based on such sanctioned plan. The impugned permission was quashed.

Headnote

A) Town Planning - Open Spaces - Alteration of Sanctioned Layout - The moot question was whether originally sanctioned open spaces in a sub-division layout, on the basis of which plots were sold, can be altered under the garb that some area above the required percentage of 15% under the regulations was available. The Court held that open spaces shown in the approved plan are integral to the layout and cannot be reduced or altered to the detriment of plot owners who purchased based on such sanctioned plan. (Paras 1, 5, 6, 7, 8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether originally sanctioned open spaces in a sub-division layout, on the basis of which plots were sold, can be altered under the garb that some area above the required percentage of 15% under the regulations was available.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned permission/NOC dated 11.12.2020 granted by the Deputy Town Planner is quashed. Rule made absolute.

Law Points

  • sanctioned open spaces cannot be altered
  • open spaces are integral to layout
  • purchasers' rights to open spaces
  • deviation from approved plan requires fresh approval
  • estoppel against developer
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (09) 129

Writ Petition No.25 of 2021

2022-09-30

G.S. Kulkarni, Bharat P. Deshpande

2022:BHC-GOA:1347-DB

Mr. Yogesh V. Nadkarni with Mr. Sanket Kamat for Petitioners; Mr. Devidas Pangam, Advocate General with Ms. Maria Correia for Respondent-State; Mr. J.P. Supekar with Mr. Roger D'Souza and Ms. Sufiyan Sayed for Respondent No.4

Mr. Raman Madhok, Mr. Neville Chico, Mr. Amit Pradhan, Mr. Joseph Noronha, Mrs. Mariam Sandhu

State of Goa, Dy. Town Planner, Village Panchayat Curca Bambolim & Talaulim, Goan Real Estate & Construction Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging permission/NOC granted by Deputy Town Planner for deviation/alteration in final approved sub-division layout of a housing project.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of permission/NOC dated 11.12.2020 allowing deletion of 9,384 sq. mts of open space from approved plan.

Filing Reason

Petitioners aggrieved by permission granted to developer to delete open spaces from approved layout for commercial/residential use.

Issues

Whether originally sanctioned open spaces in a sub-division layout, on the basis of which plots were sold, can be altered under the garb that some area above the required percentage of 15% under the regulations was available.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that open spaces shown in approved plans are integral and cannot be reduced. Respondents argued that surplus area above 15% requirement could be utilized.

Ratio Decidendi

Open spaces shown in the approved sub-division layout are integral to the layout and cannot be reduced or altered to the detriment of plot owners who purchased based on such sanctioned plan. Any deviation requires fresh approval and consent of all affected parties.

Judgment Excerpts

The moot question which arises for consideration in the present proceedings is as to whether the originally sanctioned open spaces on the basis of which plots are sold, whether can be altered under the garb that some area above the required percentage of 15% under the regulations was available.

Procedural History

Writ Petition filed in 2021; notices issued on 11.02.2021; matter taken up for final disposal at admission stage; Rule issued and heard by consent.

Acts & Sections

  • Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Government Notice for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice in Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965 — Notice Issued Without Prior Hearing Violates Section 55A and Principles of Audi Alteram Partem.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Removal of Councillor Due to Availability of Alternate Remedy. Petition under Article 227 held not maintainable as Section 13(4) read with Section 405 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 19...