Search Results for "hospital construction"

1006 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1006 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision by Informant and State, Sets Aside Discharge of Accused in Dowry Death Case. Prima facie case under Sections 306, 498-A IPC read with Section 34 IPC made out against sister-in-law based on allegations of abetment to suicide and cruelty.

The judgment arises from two criminal revision applications challenging an order of the learned Sessions Court discharging the respondent-accused (Rek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances.

The appellant, Ashok Dhondiram Dhavale, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Raigad-Alibag for the murder of Leelabai and her daughter Manisha under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'THE ASWA' and 'ASĀVA' Marks — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Due to Lack of Phonetic Similarity and Descriptive Nature of Mark.

The appellant, Meher Distilleries Private Limited, is the registered proprietor of the trademark 'THE ASWA' under Registration No.2716867 in Class-33 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petitions in VAT Reassessment Cases — Reassessment Orders Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Section 39(1) of KVAT Act, 2003. Mandatory Pre-Decision Hearing Requirement Not Waived Despite Assessee's Participation in Subsequent Proceedings.

The judgment concerns five revision petitions filed under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) against orders of the Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Benefit of Doubt on Juvenile Status and Inconsistent Evidence. Claim of juvenility at time of offence not properly considered; conviction under Sections 302, 307 read with 34 IPC set aside.

The appellant, Channappa, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yadgir, in S.C. No. 40/2012 for offences punishable under Sections 307, 302 read with 3...