Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka Decides Regular First Appeal in a Partition, Declaration and Injunction Suit. The Court Allows or Dismisses the Appeal Based on the Merits of the Case.
29 Jun 2026...
Search Results for "specific pleading"
1757 result(s) found
Found 1757 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Election Petition Challenging the Election of Returned Candidate from Mumbai North Parliamentary Constituency on Grounds of Improper Acceptance of Nomination Due to Non-Disclosure of Assets. Petitioner Alleges Material Effect on Election Outcome by Suppression of Information Under Representation of the People Act, 1950.
30 Nov 2018The election petition was filed in the Bombay High Court under Sections 100(1)(d)(i) and 100(1)(d)(iv) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, ...
- 64
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals as Not Maintainable: Order on Territorial Jurisdiction Not Appealable Under Section 13 of Commercial Courts Act. The Court Holds That Orders Under Section 9-A CPC Are Not Enumerated in Order XLIII CPC or Section 37 Arbitration Act, Limiting Appeals in Commercial Disputes.
14 Sep 2017The dispute arose out of two commercial suits filed before the Bombay High Court, where the plaintiffs claimed reliefs and the defendants raised preli...
- 76
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act in Demurrage Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings Below. Clause 10(v) Held to Create Direct Liability for Demurrage, Not Indemnity, and Counterclaim for Option Cargo Damages Rejected.
21 Dec 2016The dispute arose from a coal supply contract dated 18 September 1999 between the appellant, an Indian company, and the respondent, an Australian comp...
- 34
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Upholding Demurrage Claim. Interpretation of Clause 10(v) of Coal Supply Contract as Creating Primary Liability, Not Indemnity, and Binding Effect of Laytime Statement When No Disagreement Raised Within 30 Days Upheld.
21 Dec 2016The dispute arose out of a contract dated 18 September 1999 between Ultratech Cement Ltd. (appellant, formerly Larsen & Toubro Ltd.) and Sunfield Reso...
- 28
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjudicates Writ Petitions Against Dismissal of Amendment Applications in Civil Suit. Dispute Involves Plea of Fraud in Consent Decree and Applicability of Procedural Bars under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
4 Oct 2016The judgment arises from three writ petitions challenging a common order dated 30.10.2015 passed in Special Civil Suit No. 89/2006/B by the Civil Judg...
- 26
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Appeals Against Rejection of Applications for Rejection of Plaint in Multi-Crore Commodity Default Suit. Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Applications by Nominee Directors Dismissed at Threshold; Court to Examine Plaint Averments on Director Involvement in Spot Exchange Defaults.
5 May 2016The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, in its Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, considered two appeals filed by Gopal Shrinivasan and Shankar Bal...
- 22
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Company Law Board's Power to Direct Issue of Shares Under Section 111 of Companies Act, 1956. The appeal raises the question whether the Board can order issuance of share certificates and rectification of register absent valid transfer documents.
9 May 2014This company appeal arose from an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) dated 14 January 2013 in Company Petition No. 23 of 2012. The CLB had directed ...
- 30
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Confirms Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of 7½-Year-Old Mentally Challenged Girl. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen, Recovery, and Medical Reports Established Guilt Beyond Doubt; Aggravating Factors Outweighed Mitigating Factors.
6 May 2022The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals of Manoj Pratap Singh, upholding his conviction and death sentence for the kidnapping, rape, and murder of a 7...
- 195
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Strike Out Pleadings Under Order VI Rule 16 CPC. Court holds that disputed questions of fact regarding readiness and willingness to perform contract cannot be decided at the stage of striking out pleadings and require trial.
19 Mar 2024The case involves two civil revision applications filed by the defendants (J.P. Realities Pvt. Ltd. and its director Jaiprakash Khushalani, along with...
- 59
