Search Results for "SAT"

1155 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1155 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PF Commissioner's Challenge Against Official Liquidator's Rejection of Damages and Interest Claims in Winding Up. Priority under Section 11(2) of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 extends to damages under Section 14B and interest under Section 7Q.

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Thane, filed a Company Application challenging the adjudication order of the Official Liquidator, High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Corruption Case Due to Failed Trap and Lack of Demand Proof. Conviction under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as initial demand was not corroborated and trap did not succeed.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, clerks at Pune Municipal Cor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Corruption Case Due to Failed Trap and Lack of Demand Proof. Conviction under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as initial demand was not corroborated and trap failed.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, clerks at Pune Municipal Cor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court's Finding of Perverse Enquiry Findings. Evidence in Domestic Enquiry Must Be Sworn on Oath Before Competent Authority; Unsworn Written Statement Renders Findings Perverse Under Section 28 of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, M/s Siddheshwar Urban Coop. Bank Ltd., filed two writ petitions challenging the Part I orders of the Labour Court at Aurangabad. The r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Appeal for Annulment of Marriage Due to Suppression of Incurable Skin Disease by Wife. Fraudulent Concealment of Material Facts Renders Marriage Voidable Under Section 12(1)(c) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The appellant husband, Mayank Malhotra, filed two appeals under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, challenging a common judgment dated 23.07.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Rape of Minor in Rape Case — Conviction Based on Consistent Testimony of Victim and Medical Evidence. Appellant convicted under Section 376(2)(f) IPC for raping an 11-year-old girl; appeal dismissed as prosecution proved case beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Mohamed Farid Jafer Shaikh, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Sections 376(2)(f), 342, 363 read w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Work Order in Public Tender Dispute Due to Arbitrary Evaluation and Non-Compliance with Tender Conditions. Court holds that the respondent authority's failure to adhere to the stipulated tender conditions and its arbitrary evaluation of bids vitiates the award of the work order.

The petitioner, M/s. Hitech Audio Systems Pvt. Ltd., challenged a work order issued by the 2nd respondent, the Chief Engineer (Electrical) of the Publ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Cruelty and Homicidal Death. Conviction under Sections 498A and 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand of dowry and homicidal death beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Tanaji Dattu Bajbalkar and Sarubai Dattu Bajbalkar (in Criminal Appeal No.919 of 2009) and Uttam Krushna Bajbalkar and Mandabai Uttam ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in MCOCA Kidnapping Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Ransom. Conviction under Section 364A IPC and MCOCA set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the victim was kidnapped for ransom.

The appellants, original accused nos. 1 to 4, were convicted by the Special Judge under MCOC Case No. 15 of 2005 for offences under Section 364A, 365,...