Search Results for "Counter claim"

3554 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3554 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction in Cessed Building Area — No Violation of DCR Found. Petitioner failed to establish that the construction violated Development Control Regulations or that the building was a cessed building under MHADA.

The petitioner, Asif Abdul Sattar, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the construction of a building by Respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Joint Venture Dispute — Arbitration Clause Survives Termination of Agreement. Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 invoked for disputes arising from Joint Venture Agreement dated 28th March, 2007.

The applicant, M/s. Atul & Arkade Realty, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitrat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Additional Evidence in Appeal Against Order Refusing Revocation of Administrator. Order XLI Rule 27 CPC requires strict proof of due diligence for admitting additional evidence at appellate stage.

The case involves a Chamber Summons taken out by Ferani Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (the appellant) under Order XLI, Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against AICTE for Denial of Approval to Technical College Despite Earlier Directions. Court holds that AICTE cannot refuse approval based on deficiencies not communicated in show cause notice and must comply with earlier judicial orders.

The petitioners, Akole Taluka Education Society and its Technical Campus, filed a writ petition challenging the refusal of the All India Council for T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Grant of Leave to File Subsequent Pleadings Under Order VIII Rule 9 CPC. Trial Court's Order Set Aside as No Exceptional Circumstances Justified Filing of Additional Written Statement After Issues Were Framed.

The petitioners, original defendant Nos. 2 to 6, challenged an order passed by the trial court granting leave to the respondent No. 1 (original plaint...