Search Results for "unauthorized development"

424 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 424 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Scientist Without Inquiry in Interest of Security of State. Dismissal under Article 311(2)(c) of Constitution and Rule 14 of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 Upheld as Procedural Safeguards Not Applicable Where Security of State is Involved.

The appellant, Dr. V.R. Sanal Kumar, was a Scientist/Engineer in the Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre (VSSC), a unit of the Indian Space Research Organisa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Demolition of Illegal Construction on Khajuria Lake and Restoration of Water Body. Municipal Corporation and State Directed to Recover Costs from Erring Officers and Initiate Prosecution for Unauthorized Filling of 100-Year-Old Lake.

The petitioner, an Indian citizen and resident of Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking directions to demolish illegal construction on CT...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Municipal Corporation's Demolition Notice Under M.R.T.P. Act — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction as Structure Appears Temporary and Unauthorized.

The appellant, Mohd. Ismail Gulam Shaikh, filed an appeal against an order of the trial court refusing ad-interim relief in a suit seeking injunction ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Slum Development Agreement Due to Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 42 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act. Civil Court Cannot Entertain Disputes Relating to Slum Rehabilitation Schemes as Exclusive Jurisdiction Vests with Slum Authorities.

The plaintiff, Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of a development agreement dated 10 August 2003, entered in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Extensions in Commercial Premises. Petitioners Failed to Show Any Sanctioned Plan or Permission for Structures on Compulsory Open Space Under Section 55 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioners, occupants and owners of shops in Dattani Shopping Centre, Mumbai, challenged an order dated 14 January 2011 passed by the Assistant M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction on Municipal Land — Held That No Notice Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act Is Required for Unauthorized Occupants and That Encroachment on Public Land Cannot Be Regularized.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by different groups of petitioners challenging the demolition of their constructions on land belonging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Illegal Construction in Residential Zone. Unauthorized construction in residential zone without valid development permission is liable for demolition under MRTP Act and BMC Act.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Sharvan Developers Private Limited and others, and by Jayesh Mehta and others, challenging a demolition ...