Search Results for "tax refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "tax refund"

1158 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1158 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by ITAT — Reassessment Based on Revised Return Under Immunity Scheme Held Invalid Without Proper Examination of Section 143(1) Acceptance. The court held that the Assessing Officer must have independent reasons to believe income escaped assessment, and the revised return under the Immunity Scheme could not be the sole basis for reopening under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

20 Apr 2015

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the assessee, Sri K Nagesh, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bangalore, dated 29...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Interest on Customs Refund. Petitioner entitled to interest under Section 27A of the Customs Act, 1962 from the date of expiry of three months from the date of receipt of the refund order.

16 Sep 2016

The Petitioner, Shelf Drilling International Inc. (formerly Sedco Forex International Drilling Inc.), filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the C...

High Court

KAHC010028192013_1

26 Sep 2014

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Cess Paid Under Protest in Excise Matter — Unjust Enrichment Principle Not Applicable to Cess Under IDR Act. Section 11-B of Central Excise Act Held Inapplicable to Cess Collected Under Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, and Refund Directed with Interest.

26 Apr 2005

The petitioners, Shree Vidhya Paper Mills and Mr. Rameshwarlal Motilal, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking refund of Rs. 10,19,246...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim in Central Excise Duty Case — Limitation Period Applies Separately to Buyer. The Court held that the period of limitation of six months under Section 11B(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applies to a buyer's refund claim even if the manufacturer paid duty under protest, as the rights of manufacturer and buyer are distinct.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the appellant/buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise dut...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.388 OF 2016

19 Dec 2016

The petitioners, a company importing and supplying ATMs to State Bank of India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challengin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Additional Tax on Reduction of Loss Under Section 143(1-A) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Even Where Assessee Remains in Loss After Adjustment, Additional Tax Is Payable on the Amount of Reduction in Loss. The court held that the plain language of Section 143(1-A) applies when loss is reduced, and the additional tax is calculated on the adjustment amount as if it were total income, rejecting the argument that the provision is penal.

19 Mar 2020

The appellant, Rajasthan State Electricity Board, a government company, filed its income tax return for assessment year 1991-92 declaring a loss of Rs...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Reasonable Belief of Income Escaping Assessment. Reopening Beyond Four Years Without Fresh Material Constitutes Change of Opinion on Same Set of Facts.

11 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Gateway Leasing Pvt. Ltd., a non-banking financial company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Artic...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Whether Petitioner is Entitled to Refund of Unutilized Input Tax Credit Under GST Laws. The Court Examines Whether the Petitioner Company Supplying Services to Foreign Group Companies Qualifies as an 'Agent' Under Section 2(5) of CGST Act.

16 Jun 2025

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged two Orders-in-Appeal dated 10.08.2023 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Central Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Applies Separately to Buyer. The right of the buyer to claim refund under Section 11B(2)(e) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is distinct from that of the manufacturer, and the benefit of the second proviso (duty paid under protest) does not extend to the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise duty paid by ...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)