Search Results for "surplus declaration"

270 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 270 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Official Liquidator to Keep Provision for EPF Claims in Winding Up of Navinon Limited. Court Directs Refund of Excess Payment to EPF Office Kandivali.

This judgment arises from Official Liquidator's Report No.517 of 2015 in Company Petition No.1176 of 2001, concerning M/s.Navinon Limited (In Liquidat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Debenture Trustee's Claim for Payment from Suit Amount Held by Court Receiver in Priority Over Assignee of Decree. The court held that an assignee of a decree steps into the shoes of the assignor and cannot claim priority over the original decree holder who is a debenture trustee.

The dispute arose from a suit filed by ICICI Bank Ltd. (plaintiff) as debenture trustee for holders of 15% non-convertible debentures issued by Pal Pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Allotment of Surplus Land Under Urban Land Ceiling Act. Petitioners' claim for housing scheme under Section 20 rejected as they failed to comply with statutory requirements and the land was already allotted to a trust.

The petitioners, legal representatives of original landowners, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Allotment of Surplus Airport Land to Private Parties. Court holds that acquisition under KIAD Act is for planned development and surplus land need not be returned to original owners.

The petitioners, including an RTI activist and agriculturists, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Karnataka High Court challenging the allo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Ceiling Act Case Due to Time-Barred Suo Motu Enquiry. Additional Commissioner Cannot Initiate Second Suo Motu Enquiry Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 After First Remand Order Had Attained Finality.

The petitioner, Uttamrao Ghatge, was a landholder from Salapuri, Parbhani, who filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Case Due to Limitation Bar. Suo Moto Enquiry Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Initiated After 17 Years Held Without Jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Madhavrao Laxmanrao Karhale, a resident of Parbhani, filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEB's Challenge to Sale of Captive Power to Third Party Without Licence Under Electricity Act, 2003. Captive Generating Plant Not Required to Obtain Licence for Sale to Another Industrial Consumer Under Section 9 Read With Section 42 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra State Electricity Regulator...