Search Results for "special land acquisition officer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "special land acquisition officer"

2022 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2022 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Land Acquisition Notifications under Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 on Grounds of Non-Compliance with LARR Act, 2013. Petitioners Alleged That Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation and Non-Taking of Possession Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, and That Procedural Irregularities Vitiated the Notifications.

20 Dec 2017

The petitioners, owners of agricultural land in Jalna, challenged the acquisition of their land by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation ...

High Court

KAHC030005792015_1

24 Apr 2020

The judgment relates to a conglomeration of appeals and cross-objections arising out of land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Karnata...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines the Use of Ready Reckoner in Fixing Market Value for Land Acquired Under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The Court Considers the Validity of a Government Circular and the Reliance on Stamp Rules, and Determines That Ready Reckoner Cannot Be the Sole Determinant of Market Value Under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

20 Sep 2005

The proceedings involved two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court arising from a land acquisition dispute. The land in question was C.S.No.649,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Officer’s Endorsements Denying Compensation for Phot Kharab Lands, Directs Enquiry Under Rule 21(2) of Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, 1966. The Court held that classification as phot kharab does not automatically vest ownership in the State; the Land Acquisition Officer must ascertain whether the land falls under Rule 21(2)(a) or (b) before deciding compensation.

7 Mar 2023

Background: The case involved three writ petitions filed by landowners whose lands were acquired for the Upper Krishna Project, challenging the endors...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court's Restoration of Land Acquisition Withdrawal Notification Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appeals raise the issue whether the State Government could validly withdraw from acquisition after possession had been taken, and whether the writ petition by land owners was barred by res judicata.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute pertains to the acquisition of land for the formation of BTM Layout by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). In 1977, the State of Ka...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapsed Land Acquisition Proceedings Under 2013 Act. Petitioners Claimed Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Compliance with Provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Quash Land Acquisition Proceedings Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Due to Lapse Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. Acquisition Lapsed as Possession Not Taken and Compensation Not Paid Despite Award Made in 2008.

2 May 2019

The petitioners, Reliance Natural Resources Limited and its director Murli Manohar Purohit, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitutio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act — Possession Taken and Compensation Paid, No Lapse Occurs. The Court held that where possession has been taken and compensation paid, the acquisition does not lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

8 Mar 2017

The petitioners, owners of 2/3rd share in Survey No.4/12 and other survey numbers at Thergaon, Pune, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Co...

High Court

KAHC010023912010_1

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Appeal Against Single Judge's Dismissal of Land Acquisition Challenge. The Division Bench considered whether the dismissal of the writ petition on grounds of delay and laches was justified under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

3 Jan 2023

The appeal arises from the dismissal of a writ petition that challenged land acquisition notifications issued under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Dev...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)