Search Results for "society management dispute"

1895 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1895 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition for Appointment of Court Receiver in Redevelopment Dispute. Developer Granted Interim Relief to Take Possession of Tenements from Non-Cooperating Members Pending Arbitration Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Petitioner, M/s. R.R.B. Realtors Pvt. Ltd., a real estate developer, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Madras Considers Writ Petition Against Order of Industrial Tribunal Rejecting Plea for Award on Majority Settlement. Industrial Tribunal Found Majority Settlement Voluntary but Held It Not Binding on Non-Signatory Union Members Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The management of Caterpillar India Private Limited, a multinational manufacturing off-road vehicles, and its recognized union, Caterpillar India Priv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.15468 OF 2026

The petitioner, Polestar Realtors Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petitions in Teacher Termination Case. Repeated Denovo Enquiries After Quashing for Non-Compliance of MEPS Rules 36 and 37 Are Not Permissible.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the Head Master (brother of the President) and the President of an educational institution challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order in MOFA Dispute — Petitioner's Rights as Agreement Holder Ignored. Unilateral Conveyance Granted Without Notice to Petitioner Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 11 of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

The Petitioner, Gayatri Construction, a partnership firm, challenged an order dated 15 November 2022 and corrigendum dated 20 December 2022 passed by ...