Search Results for "reopening notice"

599 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 599 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order for Violation of Mandatory Procedure Under Section 144B of Income Tax Act, 1961. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Proper Opportunity to Respond Renders Assessment Order a Nullity.

The petitioner, Madhuri Sameer Gokhale, an individual homemaker, challenged the reassessment order dated 29 March 2022 passed by the National Faceless...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Same Material as Original Assessment is Invalid as Change of Opinion.

The petitioner, Geopreneur Realty Private Limited, a real estate development company, challenged a notice dated 30 March 2021 issued under Section 148...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment based on same facts as original assessment without new tangible material is invalid.

The petitioner, Shashikiran Janardhan Shetty, challenged a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 1 July 2014, seeking to reopen ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Income Tax Reassessment Case — Mushroom Farming Income Held Agricultural. Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Quashed as Based on Change of Opinion.

The petitioner, Zuari Foods and Farms Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company engaged in mushroom farming, filed its income tax return for assessment yea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Reasons to Believe Income Escaped Assessment. Reassessment Based on Change of Opinion Regarding Cost of Acquisition Under Section 55(2)(b)(ii) is Invalid.

The petitioner, J.B. Amin & Brothers (HUF), owned land at Aurangpura, Aurangabad, purchased by late Balubhai Amin for Rs.1,80,000. After his death in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Reasonable Belief of Income Escaping Assessment. Reassessment Initiated Beyond Four Years Without Fresh Material or Failure to Disclose by Assessee is Invalid.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s German Remedies Ltd., a public limited company engaged in manufacturing pharmaceutical products,...