Search Results for "railway negligence"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "railway negligence"

234 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 234 result(s)

High Court

High Court Allows Compensation Claim in Railways Act Case, Overturning Tribunal's Denial Based on Self-Inflicted Injury Finding. Passenger's Fall from Train Door and Attempt to De-board Non-Halting Train Held Not to Constitute Intentional Self-Inflicted Injury Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989, as Incident Occurred Due to Rush and Bonafide Mistake.

24 Mar 2026

The appeal arose from the Railway Claims Tribunal's order dated 31 January 2018 rejecting the appellant's claim for compensation for injuries sustaine...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Chief Manager Challenging Disciplinary Action for Accepting Forged Bank Guarantee. Reduction in Pay Scale Upheld as Not Disproportionate to Misconduct of Violating CMC Manual Guidelines.

6 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Rajendraprasad Shukla, was working as Chief Manager (Finance) at Western Coalfields Limited (WCL), a subsidiary of Coal India Limited....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Chief Manager Challenging Disciplinary Action for Accepting Forged Bank Guarantee. Reduction in Pay Scale Upheld as Misconduct Proven Under CMC Manual.

6 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Rajendraprasad Shukla, was employed as Chief Manager (Finance) at Western Coalfields Limited (WCL), a subsidiary of Coal India Limited...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Case — Death While Crossing Tracks Due to Lack of Footbridge Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c)(2) of Indian Railways Act, 1989. The court held that the absence of a footbridge at the station made crossing the tracks necessary, and the accident was an untoward incident in the course of working of the railway.

3 Sep 2018

The appellants, Isulal Domaji Barbate and his minor son Kushal, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal under Section 124A of the Indian Rail...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation Claim for Train Accident Victim Under Railways Act, 1989 — Amputation of Leg Due to Fall from Train Held as 'Accidental Falling' from Train Carrying Passengers.

21 Jun 2018

The appellant, Ramesh Istari @ Istaru Kore, filed a claim for compensation before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, alleging that on 24.2.2016, whi...

High Court

High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Passenger Status Upheld. Death of a person found on railway premises with a valid ticket is an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, and the burden to prove negligence or self-inflicted injury lies on the railway.

28 Jan 2016

The case involves an appeal by the dependents of Kiran Yennam, who died in an alleged untoward incident on 04.03.2010. The claimants, his wife, minor ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163A MV Act — No Fault Liability Principle Precludes Defence of Victim's Negligence. The Court held that the defence of wrongful act or neglect of the victim is not available in proceedings under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as the provision is a complete code based on no fault liability.

6 Feb 2014

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 15th June 2010 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai in M.A.C.P. No. 2554 of 1995. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railway Appeal in Passenger Death Case — Sudden Brake Application Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Railways Act, 1989. The court upheld compensation of Rs. 4 lacs to legal heirs of a passenger who died due to jerks from sudden brake application, rejecting the Railway's defense of lack of bonafide passenger status.

13 Nov 2013

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India, through the South Central Railway, against an order of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Railway Compensation for Passenger Pushed from Train by TTE — Both Legs Amputated. Held that Railway is vicariously liable for acts of its employee causing untoward incident under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

25 Jun 2013

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India (Railway) against the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, which awarded compensation of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation Claim for Bomb Blast Victim Under Railways Act, 1989 — Mother of Deceased Entitled to Rs. 2,00,000 with Interest. Death of a passenger due to bomb explosion in a train compartment is an 'untoward incident' under Section 124 of the Railways Act, 1989, and the railway administration is strictly liable to pay compensation.

27 Jun 2011

The appellant, Smt. Santabai Dattatraya Kadam, filed a claim application under Section 124 of the Railways Act, 1989, seeking compensation of Rs. 2,00...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)