Bombay High Court Allows Compensation Claim for Bomb Blast Victim Under Railways Act, 1989 — Mother of Deceased Entitled to Rs. 2,00,000 with Interest. Death of a passenger due to bomb explosion in a train compartment is an 'untoward incident' under Section 124 of the Railways Act, 1989, and the railway administration is strictly liable to pay compensation.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 80
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Smt. Santabai Dattatraya Kadam, filed a claim application under Section 124 of the Railways Act, 1989, seeking compensation of Rs. 2,00,000 for the death of her 16-year-old son in a bomb blast that occurred on 19th April 1991 at 20:40 hours in a local train compartment of the Central Railway. The deceased was holding a second class ticket from Thane to Kalwa, which was misplaced in the accident. The bomb explosion caused fatal injuries to the deceased. The respondent, Union of India represented by the General Manager, Central Railway, contested the claim by filing a written statement. The Railway Claims Tribunal dismissed the claim application. The appellant appealed to the High Court. The High Court allowed the appeal, holding that the bomb blast in the train compartment is an 'untoward incident' under Section 124 of the Railways Act, 1989, and the railway administration is liable to pay compensation. The court set aside the impugned judgment and order and directed the respondent to pay Rs. 2,00,000 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the claim application till payment.

Headnote

A) Railways Act - Untoward Incident - Section 124 - Bomb Blast - Death of passenger due to bomb explosion in train compartment is an 'untoward incident' under Section 124 of the Railways Act, 1989 - The court held that the railway administration is liable to pay compensation for death or injury caused by terrorist acts, including bomb blasts, as they fall within the definition of 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Act - The claimant, mother of the deceased, is entitled to compensation of Rs. 2,00,000 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the claim application (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the death of a passenger due to a bomb blast in a train compartment constitutes an 'untoward incident' under Section 124 of the Railways Act, 1989, entitling the claimant to compensation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The impugned judgment and order of the Railway Claims Tribunal are set aside. The respondent is directed to pay compensation of Rs. 2,00,000 to the appellant with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the claim application till payment.

Law Points

  • Strict liability under Section 124 of Railways Act
  • 1989
  • Untoward incident includes terrorist act
  • Burden of proof on railway to prove exception
  • No need to prove negligence
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (06) 68

First Appeal No.822 of 1995

2011-06-27

A.S. Oka, J.

Mr. G.J. Mohanrao for the appellant, Mr. A.N. Samant for the respondent

Smt. Santabai Dattatraya Kadam

The Union of India represented by the General Manager, Central Railway, Bombay

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of claim application under Section 124 of the Railways Act, 1989 for compensation for death in a bomb blast.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought compensation of Rs. 2,00,000 for the death of her son.

Filing Reason

Death of appellant's 16-year-old son due to bomb explosion in a local train compartment on 19th April 1991.

Previous Decisions

The Railway Claims Tribunal dismissed the claim application.

Issues

Whether the bomb blast in a train compartment is an 'untoward incident' under Section 124 of the Railways Act, 1989. Whether the appellant is entitled to compensation for the death of her son.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the bomb blast caused the death of her son, who was a bona fide passenger holding a ticket. Respondent contested the claim, but the judgment does not specify the grounds.

Ratio Decidendi

A bomb blast in a train compartment is an 'untoward incident' under Section 124 of the Railways Act, 1989, and the railway administration is strictly liable to pay compensation for death or injury caused by such incidents, without the need to prove negligence.

Judgment Excerpts

By the impugned Judgment and order, the claim application made by the appellant under section 124 of the Railways Act,1989 has been dismissed. There was an explosion of bomb in the compartment of a local train of the Central Railway on 19th April 1991 at 20.40 hours. As a result of the bomb blast, the deceased sustained injuries and ultimately succumbed to the injuries.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a claim application under Section 124 of the Railways Act, 1989 before the Railway Claims Tribunal. The Tribunal dismissed the claim. The appellant then filed the present first appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay.

Acts & Sections

  • Railways Act, 1989: 124, 124A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Compensation Claim for Bomb Blast Victim Under Railways Act, 1989 — Mother of Deceased Entitled to Rs. 2,00,000 with Interest. Death of a passenger due to bomb explosion in a train compartment is an 'untoward incident' unde...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute — Loan Repayment Disagreement Not Amounting to Criminal Offence Under Sections 406, 420 IPC. The Court held that the allegations did not disclose any criminal intent or ...