Search Results for "promoter definition"

206 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 206 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for Reduced Stamp Duty on Development Agreements Under COVID-19 Concession. Development Agreement Not Equivalent to Conveyance; Notification Under Article 25(b) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 Inapplicable.

The petitioner, M/s. Sandeep Dwellers Private Limited, a construction company, entered into three development agreements dated 28.12.2020, 31.12.2020,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Revenue's Challenge Against CESTAT Order Setting Aside Service Tax Demand on Oil Companies for CNG Sale. Dispute Concerns Classification of CNG Sale by BPCL and HPCL as Business Auxiliary Service under Section 65(19) of Finance Act, 1994.

The present civil appeals before the Supreme Court, filed by the Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai, under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Official Liquidator's Plea for Handover of Assets and Records of Companies in Liquidation. Law Enforcement Agencies' Seizure of Properties and Books of Account Examined in Context of Winding Up Proceedings Under Companies Act, 1956.

The proceedings involved multiple Official Liquidator’s Reports and a Company Application arising out of the winding up of M/s. City Limouzines (Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.5186 OF 2001

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty on Cancelled Development Agreement Under Section 47(c)(5) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner entitled to refund as transaction was cancelled before possession and within two years, not covered by Section 48 proviso.

The Petitioner, M/s. Satyam Construction, entered into a Development Agreement on 2 June 2011 with Shri Rajiv Ghule and others for development of land...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cooperative Society Bye-Law Amendment for Lack of Quorum and Procedural Irregularities. Amendment to Bye-Law 24(c) restricting voting rights to one member per family set aside as resolution passed without requisite quorum and without proper notice.

The petitioners, Uday Dalal, Ajay Biyani, Rina Pritish Nandy, and Prachi Agarwal, are members of the Malboro House Coop. Housing Society Limited, a co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Notice of Motion in Trademark Infringement Suit Due to Delay and Lack of Urgency. Plaintiffs' claim for interim injunction rejected as they failed to establish prima facie case and balance of convenience.

The plaintiffs, Lokhandwala Construction Industries Pvt. Ltd. and Lokhandwala Builders Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing ...