Search Results for "pension fixation"

291 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 291 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court hears writ petitions seeking pensionary benefits for retired employees of Water and Land Management Institute under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. Petitioners challenge State Government's refusal to grant pension communicated on 05.03.2013.

The case involved three writ petitions filed by employees and retired employees of the Water and Land Management Institute (WALMI) at Aurangabad, chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses University's Appeal in Pensionary Benefits Case for Non-Teaching Staff. Pensionary benefits based on last pay drawn in 2012 cannot be extended beyond 62 years of age as per University regulations.

The case involves an appeal by the University of Mysore against an order of a learned Single Judge in writ petitions filed by four respondents (Dr. H....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Court Officers Seeking Parity in Pension and Retirement Benefits with Higher Judicial Officers. Classification of employees into Class I and Class II based on duties and responsibilities is valid and not discriminatory under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, fifteen officers of the High Court of Bombay holding positions such as Registrar, Prothonotary, Commissioner for Taking Accounts, Add...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Recovery from Gratuity of Retired Class III and IV Employees. Recovery of excess payment made due to wrong pay fixation without fault of employee is impermissible after retirement.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by retired Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) employed with Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. The petitioners, J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Retired Railway Employee's Petition for Inclusion of Apprenticeship Period as Qualifying Service for Pension. Gap of 45 Days Between Completion of Apprenticeship and Regular Posting Breaks Continuity, Disentitling Claim for Pensionary Benefits.

The petitioner, a retired Railway employee, was appointed as an Apprentice Telecom Inspector on 23/12/1964 and completed his two-year apprenticeship o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Lecturer's Petition for Pensionary Benefits Due to Break in Service. Break in service caused by insufficient workload cannot be condoned for pension eligibility under UGC Regulations.

The petitioner, Dr. (Mrs.) Mangala Veeresh, was appointed as a full-time Lecturer in Zoology at Smt. Parvatibai Chowgule College of Arts & Science (re...