Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pensionary Benefits Under Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 — Petitioner Entitled to Pension as per Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. Held that the post of Superintendent, Legal Aid Cell is a civil post and the petitioner is entitled to pensionary benefits.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 56
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Bhaskar s/o Niwartirao Jadhav, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking pensionary benefits for his service as Superintendent, Legal Aid Cell, Beed. He had retired from that post and claimed that he was entitled to pension under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. The respondents, including the State of Maharashtra and the Accountant General, opposed the petition, arguing that the post was not a civil post and that the petitioner was not entitled to pension. The court considered the provisions of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, and the rules framed thereunder. The court noted that the petitioner had been appointed to a post created under the Act and that his salary and allowances were paid from the consolidated fund of the State. The court held that the post of Superintendent, Legal Aid Cell is a civil post and that the petitioner is entitled to pensionary benefits. The court allowed the petition and directed the respondents to compute and pay the pensionary benefits to the petitioner within a specified period.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Pensionary Benefits - Civil Post - Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 - Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 - The petitioner, who served as Superintendent, Legal Aid Cell, claimed pensionary benefits. The court examined whether the post is a civil post and whether the petitioner is entitled to pension. Held that the post of Superintendent, Legal Aid Cell is a civil post and the petitioner is entitled to pensionary benefits as per the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the post of Superintendent, Legal Aid Cell is a civil post and whether the petitioner is entitled to pensionary benefits under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition and directed the respondents to compute and pay the pensionary benefits to the petitioner within a period of three months.

Law Points

  • Pensionary benefits
  • Civil post
  • Legal Services Authorities Act
  • 1987
  • Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules
  • 1982
  • Writ jurisdiction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (03) 20

Writ Petition No.11700 of 2015

2016-03-02

S.S. Shinde, P.R. Bora

Mr. G.L. Deshpande for petitioner; Mr. D.R. Kale, AGP for respondent nos. 1 and 4

Bhaskar s/o Niwartirao Jadhav

State of Maharashtra, Department of Law & Judiciary; Accountant General; Accounts Department District Legal Services Authority, Beed; The Principal Secretary, Law and Judiciary Department; Member Secretary, District Legal Service Authority Beed

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking pensionary benefits for service as Superintendent, Legal Aid Cell.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought direction to respondents to grant pensionary benefits as per Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was denied pensionary benefits after retirement from the post of Superintendent, Legal Aid Cell, Beed.

Issues

Whether the post of Superintendent, Legal Aid Cell is a civil post? Whether the petitioner is entitled to pensionary benefits under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the post is a civil post and he is entitled to pension. Respondents argued that the post is not a civil post and petitioner is not entitled to pension.

Ratio Decidendi

The post of Superintendent, Legal Aid Cell is a civil post and the petitioner is entitled to pensionary benefits under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard. Rule made returnable forthwith. Following two issues are raised in the present petition: (1) Whether the recommendations... The court held that the post of Superintendent, Legal Aid Cell is a civil post and the petitioner is entitled to pensionary benefits.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, which was heard and finally disposed of on 2 March 2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987: Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
  • Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pensionary Benefits Under Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 — Petitioner Entitled to Pension as per Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. Held that the post of Superintendent, Legal Aid Cell...
Related Judgement
High Court Partition Dispute Judgment: Unregistered Partition Deed Not Subject to Stamp Duty and Penalty Requirement. The Bombay High Court held that an unregistered partition deed recording a family arrangement does not require impounding for stamp duty or re...