High Court of Karnataka Dismisses University's Appeal in Pensionary Benefits Case for Non-Teaching Staff. Pensionary benefits based on last pay drawn in 2012 cannot be extended beyond 62 years of age as per University regulations.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves an appeal by the University of Mysore against an order of a learned Single Judge in writ petitions filed by four respondents (Dr. H.T. Krishnegowda, Dr. Y.C. Banumathi, Sri S.R. Sudarshana, and Sri B.V. Sridhar). The respondents were non-teaching staff of the University, serving as Deputy Editor, Research Assistant Grade-1, Assistant Director, and Assistant Director respectively. They had approached the Single Judge seeking implementation of an order dated 18.08.2016 of the University, which they claimed entitled them to pensionary benefits based on their last pay drawn in 2012 until they attained 62 years of age. The Single Judge had allowed their petitions. The University appealed, arguing that the respondents were not entitled to such extension as per the applicable regulations. The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka, consisting of Chief Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Justice S. Sunil Dutt Yadav, heard the appeals. The court examined the service details and the University's order. It found that the respondents' claim for extension of pensionary benefits beyond the age of 62 was not supported by the University's regulations. The court noted that the respondents had retired at the age of 60 and that the University's order dated 18.08.2016 did not provide for such extension. Consequently, the Division Bench set aside the Single Judge's order and dismissed the writ petitions, holding that the respondents were not entitled to the relief sought.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Pensionary Benefits - Age of Superannuation - University of Mysore - The respondents, non-teaching staff, sought extension of pensionary benefits based on last pay drawn in 2012 till age 62. The University's order dated 18.08.2016 denied such extension. The court held that the University's regulations did not provide for such extension and dismissed the writ appeals. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents are entitled to pensionary benefits based on their last pay drawn in 2012 till the completion of 62 years of age.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Division Bench allowed the writ appeals, set aside the order of the learned Single Judge dated 08/01/2018 in W.P.Nos.41581-41584/2017, and dismissed the writ petitions.

Law Points

  • Pensionary benefits
  • Age of superannuation
  • University regulations
  • Non-teaching staff
  • Extension of benefits
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (KAR) (02) 29

Writ Appeal Nos.715 – 718 of 2018 (S-RES)

2018-02-26

Dinesh Maheshwari, Chief Justice, S. Sunil Dutt Yadav, J.

Sri D.N. Nanjunda Reddy, Senior Advocate for Sri T P Rajendra Kumar Sungay, Advocate

University of Mysore, Represented by its Registrar

Dr H.T. Krishnegowda, Dr Y.C. Banumathi, Sri S.R. Sudarshana, Sri B.V. Sridhar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ appeals against order of Single Judge in writ petitions seeking implementation of University order for pensionary benefits.

Remedy Sought

Respondents sought direction to implement order dated 18.08.2016 and extend pensionary benefits based on last pay drawn in 2012 till completion of 62 years of age.

Filing Reason

Respondents claimed entitlement to pensionary benefits beyond age 60 based on University order.

Previous Decisions

Single Judge allowed writ petitions; University appealed.

Issues

Whether the respondents are entitled to pensionary benefits based on their last pay drawn in 2012 till the completion of 62 years of age.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that respondents are not entitled to extension of pensionary benefits beyond 62 years as per University regulations. Respondents contended that they are entitled to benefits as per University order dated 18.08.2016.

Ratio Decidendi

The respondents are not entitled to pensionary benefits based on their last pay drawn in 2012 till the completion of 62 years of age as the University's regulations do not provide for such extension.

Judgment Excerpts

The respondents had approached the learned Single Judge seeking for a direction that the order No.ET-2-174/1996-97 dated 18.08.2016 of the Appellant University ought to be implemented and consequently, the pensionary benefits to the respondents based on their last pay drawn in 2012 be extended till the completion of 62 years of age.

Procedural History

Respondents filed writ petitions before Single Judge seeking implementation of University order. Single Judge allowed petitions. University filed writ appeals under Section 4 of Karnataka High Court Act. Division Bench heard appeals and allowed them, setting aside Single Judge's order.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka High Court Act: Section 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds ESI Dependants' Benefit for Deceased Worker Despite Wage Limit. Deceased Balram held to be an employee under Section 2(9) of ESI Act as wages were calculated per day and did not exceed Rs.1000 per month.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Caste Certificate Cancellation Order in Jenu Kuruba ST Claim Case — Petitioner's Caste Certificate Restored as Verification Committee Failed to Provide Opportunity of Hearing and Relied on Inconclusive Evidence.