Search Results for "penalty assessment"

624 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 624 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Proper Sanction Under Section 151. Sanctioning Authority Must Apply Independent Mind and Not Merely Rely on Proposal of Assessing Officer.

The petitioner, Gulbrandsen Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Gujarat High Court challenging a notice dated 16.06.2025 issued under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Penalty Order by Head Master in Private School Employment Dispute -- Assistant Teacher Challenges Withheld Increment Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act 1977 and Rules 1981 -- Head Master Lacks Authority to Impose Penalty Without Management Resolution

The petitioner, an Assistant Teacher in a private school, challenged a penalty order imposed by the Head Master that withheld his annual increment -- ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Penalty Case for Wrongful DTAA Claim — No Concealment Found. Assessee's Bonafide Belief That India-China DTAA Applied to Hong Kong Based on Official Document Precludes Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The revenue appealed against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which set aside the levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148A(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Proper Application of Mind. Notice and Order Set Aside as Show Cause Notice Did Not Disclose Reasons for Reopening Assessment Beyond Four Years.

The petitioner, Anand Kumar Somasheshekarayya Lonarmath, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — Disallows Reopening of Assessment Beyond Four Years Without Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Requires Full and True Disclosure for Reopening After Four Years.

The appellant, M/s. Safina Hotels Private Limited, filed its return of income for the assessment year 2001-02. The assessment was completed under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case on Interest Liability for Provisional Assessment. Section 11DD of Central Excise Act, 1944 not applicable to differential duty determined on finalization of provisional assessment under Rule 9B of Central Excise Rules, 1944.

The appellant, Godrej Industries Limited, was engaged in the manufacture of Liquid Hair Dye during the period from September 1982 to March 1985. The d...