Search Results for "ordinance amendment"

500 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 500 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Constitutionality of Prohibitory Orders Under Section 144 CrPC Restricting Public Assembly. Judgment Clarifies That Reasonable Restrictions on Speech and Assembly Must Be Just, Fair and Reasonable Under Articles 19 and 21.

The Supreme Court initiated a suo motu criminal writ petition regarding the incident at Ramlila Maidan on 4-5 June 2011, involving the imposition of p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench Holds Trial Court Can Frame Preliminary Issue Under Section 9-A CPC Disposing of Suit in Part. The Court interprets Section 9-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Maharashtra Amendment) to allow partial disposal of suit or cause of action on preliminary issue of jurisdiction.

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to answer a reference on whether a trial court, under Section 9-A of the Code of Civil Procedu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Non-Compliance with Section 148A(b) Procedure. Notice Issued After 01.04.2021 Without Following Mandatory Procedure Under Section 148A(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961 is Invalid Despite TOLA Extension.

The petitioner, Jayeshkumar Narsidas Madlani, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a notice issued unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Rule 8(1)(a) of Minerals Concession Rules, 2016 by Mining Lessees. Rule requiring prior approval for transfer of mining leases for minerals not in First Schedule to MMDR Act held intra vires and not inconsistent with Section 10A(2)(c) of Amendment Act 2015.

The petitioners, holders of mining leases for minerals not specified in the First Schedule to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Rule 8(1)(a) of Minerals Concession Rules, 2016 as Ultra Vires Section 10A(2)(c) of MMDR Act. Rule restricting transfer of mining leases to minerals not specified in First Schedule held inconsistent with parent Act.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions challenging the validity of Rule 8(1)(a) of the Minerals (Other than Atomic and Hydro Carbons Energy M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Review Committee for MCOCA Cases — No Statutory Basis for Review Committee Under MCOCA. Court held that MCOCA does not provide for a Review Committee and directions given in Kartar Singh for TADA cannot be imported into MCOCA.

The petitioner, Vijay Anant Vashirde, was an accused in MCOC Special Case No.6 of 2009 under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 (MCO...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Presidential Reference Made to Supreme Court Seeks Advisory Opinion on Telecom Licences and Spectrum Allocation Policies. Reference Under Article 143(1) Recites Historical Grant of Licences from 1994 to 2008 Including First-Come-First-Served and Revenue Share Regimes.

Background: The President of India made a reference under Article 143(1) of the Constitution on 12.04.2012, seeking the advisory opinion of the Suprem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.

The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...