Search Results for "maharashtra stamp act"

1453 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1453 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Rules on Stamp Duty Penalty: A Critical Examination of Section 34 of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957

The Supreme Court of India, in the case of Seetharama Shetty vs. Monappa Shetty, addressed the legal implications of Sections 33, 34, 37, and 39 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Impounding of Agreement to Sell for Stamp Duty Under Bombay Stamp Act. Agreement to Sell Deemed Conveyance Under Explanation I to Article 25 of Schedule I of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 Even When Possession Agreed to Be Transferred After Sale Deed Execution.

The appellant, Ramesh Mishrimal Jain, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 03.09.2003 in respect of a property in Khed,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Reassessment — Prior Agreement Valuation Binding. Sale Deed Executed in Conformity with Assessed Agreement Cannot Be Reopened Under Section 31A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (Goa Amendment).

The petitioners, Mr. Sameer Vasudev Morajkar and Mrs. Prithvi B. Dessai, executed a sale deed dated 16.12.2020 in respect of property measuring 1900 s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on BOT Concession Agreement — Agreement Not a Lease Under Maharashtra Stamps Act. Concession Agreement for Build, Operate and Transfer of Bridge Held Not to Create Leasehold Interest Under Section 2(n)(iii) of Maharashtra Stamps Act, 1958.

The petitioner, Abhijeet Ashoka Infra Structure Pvt. Limited, entered into a Concession Agreement with the State of Maharashtra on 16/11/1998 for cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Company in Stamp Duty Adjudication Case — Holds Adjudication Under Section 31 of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 Final and Binding. Reopening of Adjudication After 20 Years Under Section 53A Is Without Jurisdiction and Barred by Delay.

The petitioner, Hindustan Unilever Ltd., filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging...