Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Valuation Based on Charity Commissioner's Sanctioned Price. The court held that stamp duty must be assessed on the consideration actually paid or market value on date of execution, whichever is higher, under Section 2(na) of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M/s. Aakash Laviesh Leisure Pvt. Ltd., was one of the tenderers for the sale of a trust property. The Charity Commissioner, by order dated 21st June 2003, accepted the petitioner's offer and sanctioned the sale at a price of Rs.2.56 Crores, subject to conditions including payment within 6 months. The petitioner paid the full consideration within the stipulated period. However, when the conveyance deed was presented for registration, the Sub-Registrar referred the matter to the Collector for determination of market value under the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958, contending that the market value on the date of execution was higher than the sanctioned price. The petitioner challenged this action by way of a writ petition. The court held that the market value under Section 2(na) of the Bombay Stamp Act is the price the property would fetch in open market on the date of execution of the instrument. The Charity Commissioner's order fixing the price as fair and reasonable was only for a period of 6 months, and after that period, the price may change. Since the petitioner paid the consideration within 6 months, the price of Rs.2.56 Crores was the actual consideration. The court directed the Collector to assess stamp duty on the basis of the consideration actually paid, i.e., Rs.2.56 Crores, and not on any higher market value, unless the Collector finds that the market value on the date of execution was higher than that amount. The writ petition was allowed, and the rule was made absolute.

Headnote

A) Stamp Duty - Market Value - Determination - Bombay Stamp Act, 1958, Section 2(na) - The market value of property for stamp duty purposes is the price it would fetch in open market on the date of execution of the instrument, not the price sanctioned by the Charity Commissioner earlier, especially when the payment period of 6 months has expired and market conditions may have changed - Held that the stamp duty must be assessed on the consideration actually paid or the market value on the date of execution, whichever is higher (Paras 3-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the stamp duty on a conveyance deed executed pursuant to a Charity Commissioner's order sanctioning sale at a fixed price should be assessed on the basis of that sanctioned price or on the market value as on the date of execution of the deed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition and directed the Collector to assess stamp duty on the basis of the consideration actually paid by the petitioner, i.e., Rs.2.56 Crores, unless the Collector finds that the market value on the date of execution of the conveyance deed was higher than that amount. Rule made absolute.

Law Points

  • Market value under Bombay Stamp Act
  • 1958 is the price property would fetch in open market on date of execution of instrument
  • Charity Commissioner's sanctioned price is not conclusive for stamp duty
  • stamp duty is payable on consideration actually paid or market value
  • whichever is higher
  • period of 6 months for payment indicates price may change after that period
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (03) 119

WRIT PETITION NO. 4084 OF 2009

2010-03-10

SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.

Mr.Kirit J. Hakani a/w Mr. Rahul Hakani for the Petitioners, Mr.R.M.Patne, A.G.P for the Respondents 1 to 4

M/s. Aakash Laviesh Leisure Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the action of the Sub-Registrar in referring the matter to the Collector for determination of market value for stamp duty purposes.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a direction to the respondents to accept the stamp duty on the basis of the consideration of Rs.2.56 Crores as per the Charity Commissioner's order.

Filing Reason

The Sub-Registrar refused to register the conveyance deed and referred the matter to the Collector for determination of market value, claiming that the market value on the date of execution was higher than the sanctioned price.

Previous Decisions

Charity Commissioner by order dated 21st June 2003 sanctioned the sale of trust property to the petitioner at a price of Rs.2.56 Crores, subject to payment within 6 months.

Issues

Whether the stamp duty on a conveyance deed executed pursuant to a Charity Commissioner's order should be assessed on the sanctioned price or on the market value as on the date of execution.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the price of Rs.2.56 Crores was the fair and reasonable price fixed by the Charity Commissioner and the same should be the basis for stamp duty. Respondents contended that the market value on the date of execution of the deed was higher and stamp duty should be assessed on that higher value.

Ratio Decidendi

The market value for stamp duty under Section 2(na) of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 is the price the property would fetch in open market on the date of execution of the instrument. The Charity Commissioner's order fixing a price as fair and reasonable is only for a limited period (6 months) and does not determine the market value for stamp duty purposes after that period. The stamp duty must be assessed on the consideration actually paid or the market value on the date of execution, whichever is higher.

Judgment Excerpts

The very definition of market value in the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 is the value which a property could fetch, if sold in open market on the date of execution of the instrument under Section 2(na) thereof. The price which shows the market value of the property would govern on the date the price is fixed and for a reasonable period thereafter.

Procedural History

The Charity Commissioner sanctioned the sale on 21st June 2003. The petitioner paid the consideration within 6 months. When the conveyance deed was presented for registration, the Sub-Registrar referred the matter to the Collector for determination of market value. The petitioner filed the present writ petition challenging that action.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Stamp Act, 1958: Section 2(na)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Valuation Based on Charity Commissioner's Sanctioned Price. The court held that stamp duty must be assessed on the consideration actually paid or market value on date of execution, whichev...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Civil Courts. Petitioners failed to establish possession or title over suit lands; mutation entries held not conferring title...