Search Results for "frivolous litigation"

420 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 420 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Execution Proceedings - Limited Inquiry Under Order 21 Rule 101 CPC. Executing Court Not Required to Conduct Full-Fledged Trial When Obstruction is Ex Facie Baseless; Summary Rejection Permissible.

The Bombay High Court addressed the scope of inquiry to be conducted by an Executing Court under Order 21 Rule 101 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 190...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Remand Order in Property Dispute - Concurrent Findings on Limitation Upheld. High Court Erred in Remanding Matter for Fresh Trial Instead of Deciding Substantial Question of Law Under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The appeal arose from a property dispute involving a joint Hindu family. The litigation originated from a 1965 suit (O.S.No.851 of 1965) filed by Sund...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses "Crimeophobia" PIL as Frivolous: Critiques Misuse of Judicial Time. Public Interest Litigation filed by a self-styled criminologist sought wide-ranging and unrelated reliefs, including the establishment of an Anti-Organized Crime Unit and other diverse demands.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a PIL filed by "Crimeophobia," a criminology firm led by Mr. Snehil Dhall, citing it as an example of frivolous litiga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Partition Suit, Upholding High Court's Decree on Property Shares and Invalidating Compromise. Legal Heirs' Dispute Over Ancestral and Self-Acquired Properties Resolved with Shares Determined Under Hindu Law, and Compromise Set Aside Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The litigation originated from a partition suit filed by Charulata Sahoo (plaintiff) against her brother Prafulla Sahoo (defendant No. 1) and sister S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Appeal in Divorce Case — Concurrent Findings of No Cruelty or Desertion Upheld. Allegations Under Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Not Proven.

The appellant-husband, Satish Dhudku Halnor, filed a second appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging the concurrent judgment and decree dismiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Quo Warranto Petition Challenging Appointment of Additional Judge as Abuse of Process. Petition filed by an advocate questioning appointment of Respondent No.7 as additional judge of Bombay High Court held to be trumpery and frivolous.

The petitioner, an advocate practicing in the Bombay High Court, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of quo warranto challenging the appointment of R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit for Recovery Due to Prior Arbitration Awards. The court held that the suit is barred by res judicata as the same claims were already adjudicated in arbitration proceedings under the Arbitration Act, 1940.

The plaintiff, Unique Integrated Transport & Management Consultancies Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL) and its of...