Search Results for "extension without tender"

407 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 407 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 15216 OF 2025

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Contract by Food Corporation of India Due to COVID-19 Pandemic. Non-Submission of Bank Guarantee Within Stipulated Period Held to be Force Majeure, and Debarment Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice.

The petitioner, M/s. Gupta Freight Carrier, a proprietorship firm, was awarded a contract by the Food Corporation of India (FCI) on 20.03.2020 for tra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Odisha Forest Development Corporation Ltd. in Tender Dispute — Refund of Deposit Ordered by High Court Set Aside. Forfeiture of Security Deposit Upheld as Per Contract Terms When Writ Petition Withdrawn Without Pressing Challenge.

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of appeals arising from orders of the High Court of Orissa. The appellant, Odisha Forest Development Corporat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages in Construction Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitrator's Finding of Delay and Quantification of Liquidated Damages Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s B.E. Billimoria & Co. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging part of a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against AICTE for Denial of Approval to Technical College Despite Earlier Directions. Court holds that AICTE cannot refuse approval based on deficiencies not communicated in show cause notice and must comply with earlier judicial orders.

The petitioners, Akole Taluka Education Society and its Technical Campus, filed a writ petition challenging the refusal of the All India Council for T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Railway Contract Dispute. Arbitration Clause in Works Contract Enforced Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The applicant, a registered government contractor, was awarded a contract by the respondent, the General Manager of South Central Railway, for extensi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute. Court upholds award granting compensation for work done, security deposit refund, and loss of profit under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Union of India, through the Chief Project Manager (Conversion), Central Railway, Mumbai, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court upholds single judge's refusal to set aside award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that findings of fact by arbitrator are not open to challenge.

The Union of India (appellant) had invited tenders for construction work, and Moti Enterprises (respondent) was the successful tenderer. The contract ...