Search Results for "eminent domain"

225 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 225 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Landowner's Petition in Land Acquisition Case Due to Delay in Final Notification Under Section 11(7) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Preliminary Notification Deemed Rescinded as Final Notification Not Issued Within Statutory Period.

The petitioner, Sri K. Ganganna, owned lands that were acquired by the respondents for the Indian Railways. A preliminary notification under Section 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MIDC's Allotment of Acquired Land for Residential Township. Land acquired for industrial development can be used for residential purposes as per MIDC's policy; no legitimate expectation of continued industrial use.

The petitioners, Sudam Vithoba Dhumal and Dilip Sudam Dhumal, filed a writ petition challenging the action of Respondent No.1, Maharashtra Industrial ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under the BDA Act and the Land Acquisition Act.

A batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India came before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, presided...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010259352010_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010023912010_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010022932010_1

A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Against Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout; Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Under BDA Act, 1976.

Multiple writ petitions were filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various landowners challenging land acquisition proceedi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to BDA Scheme Non-Lapse and Government's Withdrawal Notification. Scheme Under BDA Act Does Not Lapse Automatically Under Section 27; Government's Power to Withdraw from Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Upheld.

The petitioner, Sri H. Krishna Reddy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the 'By...