Search Results for "electricity deposit"

656 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 656 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Issues Rule and Hears Matter Finally in Writ Petition Challenging MSEDCL Communication. The Court Decides the Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution with Consent of Parties After Respondents Waive Service.

The petitioners, a private limited company and its shareholder, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Seeking Quashing of Impugned Order Dated 05.02.2024 and Mandamus for Relocation of Transmission Tower. Challenge Based on Lack of Consent Under Section 67(2) of Electricity Act, 2003 and Violation of Natural Justice.

The petitioners, five brothers who jointly own agricultural land measuring 6 acres 02 guntas in Kasinakunte village, Nidagundi Taluk, Vijayapura Distr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal of BEST Undertaking Against Liquidator's Rejection of Interest Claim and Secured Creditor Status in Liquidation of Spark Green Energy. Interest-Free Deposit Does Not Attract Interest, and Unregistered Charge Does Not Confer Secured Status Under IBC.

The appeal was filed by Brihanmumbai Electricity Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST) against an order of the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT Mumbai B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Concerning Forfeiture of Bid Securities in Tender Process. The Petition Questions Whether the Arbitrator Correctly Interpreted Clause 19.6 of the Tender Instructions and the Law on Bank Guarantees.

The dispute arose out of a tender process floated by the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited for supply, construction, and comm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition in Power Supply Dispute Due to Bona Fide Dispute. Debt under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 not recoverable via winding up when substantial defense exists.

The petitioner, Vedanta Limited, filed a company petition seeking winding up of the respondent, Global Energy Private Limited, under Section 433(e) of...