High Court of Karnataka Allows IT Companies to be Classified as Industrial Consumers for Electricity Tariff — BESCOM's Demand for Commercial Tariff Quashed. Software development and IT-enabled services companies engaged in manufacturing activity are entitled to HT 2(A) industrial tariff under the Electricity Act, 2003.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by IT/ITeS companies, including Talisma Corporation Private Limited, Cognizant Technology Solutions India Pvt. Ltd., and Integra Micro Software Service Private Limited, against the Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited (BESCOM) and its officers. The petitioners challenged the demand notices issued by BESCOM classifying them as commercial consumers and demanding tariff under the commercial category instead of the industrial category (HT 2(A)). The petitioners contended that they were engaged in software development and IT-enabled services, which constitute manufacturing activity, and therefore they were entitled to be classified as industrial consumers. They relied on a circular dated 10.11.2006 issued by BESCOM itself, which classified IT companies as industrial consumers. The respondents argued that the petitioners were not engaged in manufacturing as they did not produce tangible goods, and therefore they fell under the commercial category. The court analyzed the definition of 'manufacturing' under various statutes, including the Factories Act, 1948 and the Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1961, and held that software development and IT-enabled services involve processing and transformation of data and information, which is akin to manufacturing. The court also noted that the circular dated 10.11.2006 was binding on BESCOM and could not be ignored. The court quashed the demand notices and directed BESCOM to classify the petitioners as industrial consumers under HT 2(A) category and to refund any excess amount collected from them. The court also directed BESCOM to consider the representation of the petitioners in light of the judgment.

Headnote

A) Electricity Law - Classification of Consumer - Industrial vs. Commercial - HT 2(A) Tariff - The court considered whether IT/ITeS companies, which are not engaged in traditional manufacturing, can be classified as industrial consumers for electricity tariff purposes. The court held that the term 'manufacturing' under the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (Tariff) Regulations includes software development and IT-enabled services, as these activities involve processing and transformation of data and information, akin to manufacturing. The court relied on the definition of 'manufacturing' under the Factories Act, 1948 and the Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1961, and held that the nature of activity, not the nomenclature, determines classification. (Paras 10-25)

B) Electricity Law - Tariff Circular - Binding Nature - Circular dated 10.11.2006 - The court examined the circular issued by BESCOM on 10.11.2006, which classified IT companies as industrial consumers. The court held that such circulars are binding on the electricity supply company and cannot be unilaterally withdrawn or ignored without proper amendment of tariff regulations. The court directed BESCOM to follow the circular and classify the petitioners as industrial consumers under HT 2(A) category. (Paras 26-30)

C) Electricity Law - Demand Notice - Quashing - The court quashed the demand notices issued by BESCOM to the petitioners demanding commercial tariff, as they were contrary to the circular and the settled legal position. The court held that the demand notices were arbitrary and unsustainable. (Paras 31-35)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether software development and IT-enabled services companies, which are not engaged in traditional manufacturing, can be classified as 'industrial consumers' for the purpose of electricity tariff under the HT 2(A) category?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petitions, quashed the demand notices, and directed BESCOM to classify the petitioners as industrial consumers under HT 2(A) category. The court also directed BESCOM to refund any excess amount collected from the petitioners and to consider their representations in light of the judgment.

Law Points

  • Classification of consumer
  • Industrial consumer
  • Commercial consumer
  • HT 2(A) tariff
  • Manufacturing activity
  • Software development
  • IT services
  • Electricity Act
  • 2003
  • Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission
  • Tariff Regulations
  • BESCOM
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (KAR) (11) 14

W.P.Nos.57324-325/2015 c/w W.P.No.36174/2017, W.P.No.32770/2013 & W.P.No.7630/2012 (GM-KEB)

2017-11-27

Dr. Vineet Kothari

Sri Devaiah I.S., Smt. Nalina Mayegowda, Sri Shridhar Prabhu, Sri Sriranga, Sri H.V. Devaraju

Talisma Corporation Private Limited, Cognizant Technology Solutions India Pvt. Ltd., Integra Micro Software Service Private Limited

Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited (BESCOM) and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging demand notices issued by BESCOM classifying the petitioners as commercial consumers and demanding tariff under commercial category instead of industrial category.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of demand notices and direction to BESCOM to classify the petitioners as industrial consumers under HT 2(A) category and to refund excess amount collected.

Filing Reason

BESCOM issued demand notices classifying the petitioners, who are IT/ITeS companies, as commercial consumers and demanding higher tariff, contrary to the circular dated 10.11.2006 and the nature of their activities.

Previous Decisions

The court referred to a judgment dated 5.12.2014 in W.P. No.22/2014, but the details are not provided in the text.

Issues

Whether IT/ITeS companies can be classified as industrial consumers for electricity tariff? Whether the circular dated 10.11.2006 issued by BESCOM is binding? Whether the demand notices issued by BESCOM are arbitrary and unsustainable?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they are engaged in software development and IT-enabled services, which constitute manufacturing activity, and therefore they are entitled to be classified as industrial consumers under HT 2(A) category. They relied on the circular dated 10.11.2006 and the judgment in W.P. No.22/2014. Respondents argued that the petitioners are not engaged in manufacturing as they do not produce tangible goods, and therefore they fall under the commercial category. They contended that the circular was not binding and that the classification should be based on the actual nature of activity.

Ratio Decidendi

The term 'manufacturing' under the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (Tariff) Regulations includes software development and IT-enabled services, as these activities involve processing and transformation of data and information, akin to manufacturing. The circular dated 10.11.2006 issued by BESCOM classifying IT companies as industrial consumers is binding on BESCOM and cannot be unilaterally withdrawn or ignored.

Judgment Excerpts

The court held that software development and IT-enabled services involve processing and transformation of data and information, which is akin to manufacturing. The court directed BESCOM to follow the circular dated 10.11.2006 and classify the petitioners as industrial consumers under HT 2(A) category.

Procedural History

The writ petitions were filed in 2012, 2013, 2015, and 2017 challenging demand notices issued by BESCOM. The court heard all matters together and delivered a common judgment on 27.11.2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
  • Electricity Act, 2003:
  • Factories Act, 1948:
  • Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1961:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows IT Companies to be Classified as Industrial Consumers for Electricity Tariff — BESCOM's Demand for Commercial Tariff Quashed. Software development and IT-enabled services companies engaged in manufacturing activity ar...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Decree Holder's Application to Implead Auction Purchaser in Execution Proceedings — Order VI Rule 17 CPC Application Rejected as Execution is Not a 'Trial' and Amendment Would Change Nature of Suit