WRIT PETITION NO.323 OF 2000
18 Oct 2005Multiple writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court by various companies, including Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited and India...
Search Results for "developer permission"
632 result(s) found
Found 632 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal Against Injunction Restraining Unauthorized Construction of Additional Floors. Purchaser's Right to Seek Injunction Upheld Where Developer Alters Building Character Without Consent and Fails to Form Society as Agreed.
14 Feb 2012The appeal arises from a suit filed by the respondent (original plaintiff) against the appellant (original defendant) seeking a permanent injunction r...
- 90
High Court
High Court of Bombay Hears Challenge to Stop Work Notice and Directions Under Regulation 58 of DCR for Greater Bombay 1991. Dispute Concerns Obligation of Cotton Textile Mill to Hand Over Land for Worker Housing and Open Spaces Immediately After Layout Approval.
11 May 2012The matter concerned two properties owned by a textile company in Mumbai: a mill at Prabhadevi and Spring Mills at Dadar. The company closed the latte...
- 19
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Developer Selection in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme - Tenants of Municipal Corporation Held Ineligible to Vote. The court upheld the selection of developer by General Body Meeting, finding no procedural irregularity in service of notice or conduct of meeting.
25 Jan 2024The petitioners, claiming to be eligible slum dwellers, challenged the appointment of Respondent No.7 as developer for a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme on...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Injunction Application in Redevelopment Dispute and Holds Civil Suit Not Barred by Section 91 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Developer's Claim for Specific Performance of Development Agreement Against Co-operative Housing Society Held Maintainable as Developer Is Not a Member Under Section 91, and Transaction Not Subject to Restrictions Under Sections 43, 44, or 45.
13 Jul 2016The suit was filed by a partnership firm of developers, Maya Developers, against the Azad Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and its members, seeking s...
- 27
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Slum Land Acquisition Notification for Non-Compliance with Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Slum Act. Land Owner's Property Acquired Without Proper Application by SRA and Without Opportunity of Hearing.
17 Nov 2022The petitioner, Deena Pramod Baldota, is the owner of land bearing CTS No.355 (part) and other sub-numbers admeasuring about 5115.2 sq. meters situate...
- 98
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Delayed Possession and Refund. The court upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's order for refund with interest, rejecting the developer's argument that possession delivery period should start from Fire NOC date under the Apartment Buyers Agreement, as construction had commenced earlier.
21 Jan 2022The appeals arose under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 from the decision of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission on co...
- 190
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Developers and MCGM from Recognizing TDR Transfer Agreements in Alleged Fraud by Society Members. Co-operative Housing Society Obtains Interim Relief Against Sale of Transferable Development Rights (TDR) Under DRC Dated 7 August 2023 Amidst Allegations of Forgery and Unauthorized Payments.
3 Oct 2025The dispute arose from the acquisition of a portion of the plaintiff co-operative housing society's land by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumba...
- 10
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Illegal Construction in Residential Zone. Unauthorized construction in residential zone without valid development permission is liable for demolition under MRTP Act and BMC Act.
30 Nov -0001The case involves two writ petitions filed by Sharvan Developers Private Limited and others, and by Jayesh Mehta and others, challenging a demolition ...
- 186
High Court
Bombay High Court Reconsiders Promoter's Right to Additional Construction Under MOFA After Supreme Court Remand. Dispute Centers on Whether Section 7A Overrides Flat Purchasers' Consent Requirement for Additional Wings in an Existing Scheme.
7 Oct 2010The Bombay High Court heard two first appeals remanded by the Supreme Court in a dispute between Madhuvihar Cooperative Housing Society (the society) ...
- 28
