Search Results for "developer/promoter"

270 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 270 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Competent Authority Order in MOFA Dispute — Failure to Provide Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Section 5A of MOFA Requires Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Before Directing Conveyance of Land to Society.

The petitioners, Mazda Construction Company, Maredia Enterprises, and Sultanabad CHS Ltd. (Proposed), challenged an order dated 11.04.2012 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Corrigenda to Deemed Conveyance Certificates Under Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963. Competent Authority Issued Certificates for Constructed Area and Later Extended to Land Without Notice, Prompting Promoters to Seek Quashing.

Background: The dispute involved ten cooperative housing societies formed under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, in a development cal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.495 OF 2015

The judgment under consideration pertains to four appeals arising from a property dispute involving final plot no.267 of Town Planning Scheme IV, Mahi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to MOFA Amendments and Upholds Conveyance Order — Amendments to Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963 by Act No.4 of 2008 are intra vires and Competent Authority's order directing conveyance is valid as promoter failed to execute conveyance within statutory period.

The petitioner, M/s. Shree Siddharth Construction, a partnership firm, challenged the constitutional validity of amendments made to the Maharashtra Ow...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Interim Applications in Redevelopment Contract Dispute Between Developer and Partner. The Court Examines Injunctions Against Termination and Alienation of Property Under the Specific Relief Act.

The plaintiff, Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913, filed Suit No. 1512 of 2009 before the Bombay ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Conversion Case Due to Non-Compliance with Policy Conditions. Petitioner's Claim for Leasehold to Freehold Conversion Failed as Land Area and Capital Investment Did Not Meet Mandatory Requirements Under Uttar Pradesh Tourism Policy, 2013.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a company challenging the order dated 24.01.2022 issued by respondent No. 1, which rejected its propos...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Housing Society in Property Dispute Over Water Connection and Construction. Developer's Agreement to Provide Water Connection and Restrict Construction Held Binding.

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a judgment and decree dated 31st March 2004 in L.C. Suit No. 786 of 2004. The appellants in First App...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cooperative Society Registration — Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi as Non-Member. Registration of Dayal Smruti Cooperative Housing Society under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 upheld as petitioner was not a member and had no right to object.

The petitioner, Rachana Developers, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bom...