KAHC010159832015_1
15 Dec 2017...
Search Results for "declaration void"
2601 result(s) found
Found 2601 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Election Petition Challenging the Election of Returned Candidate from Mumbai North Parliamentary Constituency on Grounds of Improper Acceptance of Nomination Due to Non-Disclosure of Assets. Petitioner Alleges Material Effect on Election Outcome by Suppression of Information Under Representation of the People Act, 1950.
30 Nov 2018The election petition was filed in the Bombay High Court under Sections 100(1)(d)(i) and 100(1)(d)(iv) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, ...
- 58
High Court
- 16
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Reverses High Court Judgment in Property Dispute, Declaring 1985 Document as Will, Not Gift. The Court Held That the Disposition Took Effect on Death, Not in Praesenti, Under Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and That the High Court Erred in Setting Aside Concurrent Findings Without a Substantial Question of Law Under Section 100 CPC.
24 Mar 2025The appeal arose from a property dispute between siblings over a document executed by their father in 1985. The respondent, the daughter, filed a suit...
- 343
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Limitation for Voidable Alienations by Guardian. Suit for Declaration and Possession Without Seeking Setting Aside of Sale Deeds Held Maintainable Under Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963.
1 Feb 2019The case involves a property dispute arising from a Will executed by Petha Gounder on 17.05.1971, bequeathing a life interest to his sons Kannan and B...
- 202
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alienations and Direction to Frame Scheme for Charitable Trust. High Court Held Will Dated 27.9.1968 Was Mutual and Joint, and Alienations by Surviving Spouse Void.
1 Aug 2026These appeals arose from Original Suit No. 76 of 1981, filed by Hindu Community in General and Citizens of Gobichettipalayam as plaintiff, seeking adm...
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Rejects Plaint in Property Suit as Barred by Limitation — Failure to Disclose Cause of Action Within Three Years of Knowledge of Alleged Fraud Leads to Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC. The court held that the plaintiff's knowledge of the alleged fraud in 2015 or earlier triggered the limitation period under Article 58 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and the suit filed in 2021 was beyond the prescribed period.
18 Jul 2022The plaintiff, Ramesh Mali, filed a suit seeking declaration and injunction in respect of certain properties originally owned by his deceased father, ...
- 37
Supreme Court
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7370 OF 2026
1 Jan 1970The present Civil Appeal arises from a suit for declaration of ownership of agricultural properties based on a Will dated 20.04.2018, allegedly execut...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Income Tax Order Under Section 281 for Lack of Notice to Transferee. Transfer of Property by Assessee Held Not Void Against Bona Fide Purchaser Without Notice of Pending Proceedings.
19 Jul 2022The petitioner, Nitin Nagarkar, purchased a land and farm house at village Bawdhan, Pune, vide a deed of conveyance dated 5th August 1997 from vendors...
- 63
High Court
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2486 OF 2005
30 Nov 2005The suit was filed by shareholders of Spice Jet Ltd, a domestic airline company formerly known as Modi Luft, which had undergone several ownership cha...
- 13
