NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2486 OF 2005

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The suit was filed by shareholders of Spice Jet Ltd, a domestic airline company formerly known as Modi Luft, which had undergone several ownership changes and financial restructuring. The plaintiffs, Kesha Appliances Pvt. Ltd. and others, challenged the preferential allotment of 8,10,77,500 cumulative redeemable convertible preference shares (CRPS) made by defendant no.7 (Spice Jet Ltd) to defendant no.1 (Royal Holdings Services Ltd.) in October 2000. They alleged that the special resolution passed on 27.8.1999 under Section 81(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 1956 was invalid because after the controlling interest in defendant no.1 was transferred from Ajmal Khan to the Kansagra Brothers through overseas corporate bodies, a fresh resolution was required and the exemption under SEBI Takeover Regulations was no longer available. The plaintiffs further challenged the subsequent sale of a portion of those shares by defendant no.1 to defendants 2 to 6, and various further allotments of convertible warrants, equity shares, and debentures made in 2004-2005 to defendants 8 to 12. The suit sought declarations that these transactions were illegal, null and void, and prayed for rectification of the register of members. The matter came up before the Bombay High Court on two Notices of Motion for interim reliefs. The available text from the judgment only narrates the factual background and the prayers sought by the plaintiffs; it does not include any submissions, analysis, or decision by the court.

Issue of Consideration

NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2486 OF 2005

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (11) 3

Notice of Motion No. 2486 of 2005 and Notice of Motion No. 2260 of 2005 in Suit No. 2142 of 2005

2005-11-30

S.U. Kamdar, J.

Navroze Seervai, Percy Gandy, Ketan Parekh, Firdaus Puniwala, Crawford Bayley & Co., Aspi Chinoy, Shrikant Doijode, M/s. Doijode Associates, K.G. Munshi, Kanga and Co., Janak Dwarkadas, P.K. Samdani, Anuj Bhasme, Wadia Gandy and Co., Virag Tulzapurkar, Amerchand Mangaldas, S.A. and Shroff, Gaurav Joshi, Desai, Ashish Bhatia, J. Sagar Associates, Dr. Abhishek Singhvi, F. Divitre, Darius Khambhatta, Amol Doijode, Dinyar Madon, A.R. Bhole, Shyam Mehta, Rustomji Ginwalla, Virendra Tulzapurkar, Negandhi Shah & Himaytullah

Kesha Appliances P.Ltd and Ors.

Royal Holdings Services Ltd and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Suit filed by shareholders of Spice Jet Ltd challenging the validity of preferential allotment of shares and subsequent transfers, alleging violations of the Companies Act, 1956 and SEBI Takeover Regulations.

Remedy Sought

Plaintiffs sought declarations that the preferential allotment of 8,10,77,500 CRPS to defendant no.1 and subsequent allotments and transfers to other defendants are illegal, null and void, and sought rectification of the register of members by removing the names of defendant nos. 1 to 6 and 8 to 12.

Filing Reason

Plaintiffs alleged that the preferential allotment of CRPS to defendant no.1 was invalid because the special resolution under Section 81(1)(a) was passed when defendant no.1 was controlled by Ajmal Khan, and after control passed to Kansagra Brothers, a fresh resolution was required; also that the allotment violated SEBI Regulations, making all downstream transfers void.

Issues

Whether the preferential allotment of 8,10,77,500 CRPS to defendant no.1 in October 2000 is illegal and in violation of SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997. Whether the special resolution dated 27.8.1999 under Section 81(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 1956 is invalid due to non-disclosure of change in controlling interest of the allottee. Whether the sale of shares by defendant no.1 to defendants 2 to 6 is void ab-initio as a consequence of the original allotment being invalid. Whether the subsequent allotments of convertible warrants, equity shares, and debentures to defendants 8 to 12 in 2004-2005 are without authority of law and illegal. Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to rectification of the register of members of defendant no.7 company.

Judgment Excerpts

It is the case of the plaintiff that the preference share allotment of 8,10,77,500 C.R.C.P.S. to defendant no.1 by defendant no.7 in October 2000 is bad in law and violative of Regulation 12 of the Security and Exchange board of India (substantial acquisition of shares and Take Overs) Regulation 1997 and thus illegal. the plaintiffs are challenging in the present suit the preferential allotment of 8,10,77,500 C.R.C.P.S. by 7th defendant to 1st defendant by passing a special resolution in October 2000. Thus in

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 1956: 81(1)(a)
  • Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997: Regulation 3(1)(c), Regulation 10, Regulation 12
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2486 OF 2005
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Disciplinary Orders in Insurance Company Service Matter — Limited Scope of Judicial Review Under Article 226 for Private Sector Domestic Enquiries. The court declined to interfere with concurren...