Search Results for "coastal property"

147 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 147 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction in Cessed Building Area — No Violation of DCR Found. Petitioner failed to establish that the construction violated Development Control Regulations or that the building was a cessed building under MHADA.

The petitioner, Asif Abdul Sattar, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the construction of a building by Respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) for Concealment of Income in Land Sale Transaction. Assessee failed to disclose receipt of advance sale consideration in return, leading to penalty for concealment.

The appellant-assessee, along with four others, executed an agreement for sale of a plot of land at Vasai on 07.12.2004 for a total consideration of R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Developer in Slum Rehabilitation Project Due to Non-Compliance with Scheme Conditions. Order of CEO SRA Upheld as Developer Found to Have Violated Terms of Agreement and Failed to Complete Project.

The petitioner, a company engaged as a developer for a slum rehabilitation project on a property owned by a cooperative housing society, filed a writ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Application in Out-of-State Contract Dispute. Holds That Arbitration Is Not a 'Thing Done' Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958, and Contract Executed and Performed Outside Maharashtra Is Not Liable to Stamp Duty in Maharashtra.

The applicant, S Satyanarayana & Co, a partnership firm based in Visakhapatnam, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Maritime Board Dispute Over Cargo Handling Charges. Court sets aside majority award directing payment at Rs.3 per metric tonne, remits matter for fresh consideration on applicability of 1995 or 1996 policy.

The Maharashtra Maritime Board (Claimant) filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging a m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010005522012_1

...