Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) for Concealment of Income in Land Sale Transaction. Assessee failed to disclose receipt of advance sale consideration in return, leading to penalty for concealment.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant-assessee, along with four others, executed an agreement for sale of a plot of land at Vasai on 07.12.2004 for a total consideration of Rs.2,60,00,000. The appellant's share was 49.2%. During the financial year relevant to Assessment Year 2005-06, a sum of Rs.1,05,01,111 was received as advance, but conveyance was not executed and possession was not handed over. In the original return of income filed for AY 2005-06, the assessee did not offer this receipt to tax. The Assessing Officer, during assessment proceedings, detected the receipt and the assessee then filed a revised return offering the amount as income from capital gains. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment and also initiated penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirmed the penalty, and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal upheld the same. The assessee appealed to the High Court under Section 260-A of the Act, raising the substantial question of law whether the Tribunal was right in confirming the levy of penalty. The High Court held that the assessee had concealed the receipt of advance sale consideration in the original return and only offered it after detection by the Assessing Officer. The court applied Explanation 1 to Section 271(1)(c), which deems the assessee to have concealed income if no explanation is offered or the explanation is false. The court found that the assessee's explanation that the amount was not taxable as it was only an advance and not income was not sustainable, as the amount was received and was assessable as capital gains. The court upheld the penalty, dismissing the appeal.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - Concealment of Income - The assessee failed to disclose receipt of advance sale consideration in the original return and only offered it after detection by the Assessing Officer - Held that penalty under Section 271(1)(c) is justified as the assessee concealed income and Explanation 1 to Section 271(1)(c) applies (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Tribunal was right in law in confirming the levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Law Points

  • Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act
  • 1961 is leviable for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars
  • even if the income is offered in revised return after detection by Assessing Officer
  • Explanation 1 to Section 271(1)(c) applies.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (08) 24

Income Tax Appeal No.1742 of 2011

2020-08-17

Ujjal Bhuyan, Milind N. Jadhav

Nishant Thakkar, Jasmin Amalsadvala, Pooja K, Nahush Shah Legal (for Appellant); A.R. Malhotra, N.A. Kazi (for Respondent)

Shri. Omprakash T. Mehta

Income Tax Officer 21 (3) (4)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Income tax appeal against penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to set aside the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act.

Filing Reason

Appellant challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal confirming the penalty for concealment of income.

Previous Decisions

Assessing Officer levied penalty under Section 271(1)(c); Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirmed the penalty; Income Tax Appellate Tribunal upheld the penalty.

Issues

Whether the Tribunal was right in law in confirming the levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the amount received was only an advance and not income, and hence not taxable; penalty was not justified. Revenue argued that the assessee concealed the receipt in the original return and only offered it after detection, attracting penalty under Section 271(1)(c).

Ratio Decidendi

Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) is leviable when the assessee conceals income or furnishes inaccurate particulars. Explanation 1 to Section 271(1)(c) applies where the assessee fails to offer an explanation or offers a false explanation. In this case, the assessee did not disclose the receipt of advance sale consideration in the original return and only offered it after detection by the Assessing Officer, constituting concealment.

Judgment Excerpts

Whether the Tribunal was right in law in confirming the levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act ? Appellant alongwith 4 others executed an agreement for sale dated 07.12.2004 in respect of a plot of land at Vasai.

Procedural History

Assessing Officer completed assessment and levied penalty under Section 271(1)(c); Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirmed penalty; Income Tax Appellate Tribunal upheld penalty; assessee appealed to High Court under Section 260-A.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 260-A, Section 271(1)(c), Explanation 1 to Section 271(1)(c)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) for Concealment of Income in Land Sale Transaction. Assessee failed to disclose receipt of advance sale consideration in return, leading to penalty for concealment.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Murder and Atrocities Case Due to High Court's Perfunctory Consideration of Evidence. Bail Orders Set Aside as High Court Failed to Evaluate Gravity of Offences Under Section 302 IPC and SC/ST Act, Ignoring Eyewitness Ac...