Search Results for "Trademark Dispute"

130 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 130 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Defendant's marks 'Ultraplus Cement', 'Ultra HiTouch', and 'UltraPower' held deceptively similar to registered 'UltraTech' marks under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The plaintiffs, UltraTech Cement Limited and another, filed a commercial IP suit seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the defendant, M/s. Shiv C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sun Pharma's Trademark Infringement Suit Against Sanofi's METOSAN, Finding No Deceptive Similarity with METOSARTAN. The marks are phonetically and visually distinct, and the products differ in composition, negating likelihood of confusion.

The plaintiff, Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against The Madras Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Passing Off and Trade Mark Infringement of 'CARTER'S BLUE' Mark. Defendants' Use of Deceptively Similar Names Despite Conducting Agreement and Registration Constitutes Passing Off.

The plaintiff, Mehboob Khan, sole proprietor of 'Carter's Blue' restaurant, filed a suit for trade mark infringement and passing off against the defen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Interim Injunction in Trademark and Copyright Infringement Suit Due to Suppression of Material Facts. Plaintiff's Conduct of Suppressing Prior User and Earlier Litigation Disentitles It to Equitable Relief Under Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Copyright Act, 1957.

The suit was filed by ITC Limited against NTC Industries Ltd. for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off in relation to cigarettes and t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'Café Madras' Restaurant Name. The mark 'Café Madras' held to be inherently distinctive and entitled to protection against use by a subsequent restaurant of the same name.

The plaintiffs, the Kamath family, have been running a restaurant named 'Café Madras' in Matunga, Mumbai since 1938. The restaurant has acquired a re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Restrains Use of 'SAMRAT' Mark for Atta. Registered proprietor of 'SAMRAT' mark in Class 30 entitled to interim injunction against phonetically identical mark for similar goods under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The appellant, Prakash Agro Industries Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing and marketing food products including besan, pulses, wheat flour, and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband to Lead Evidence First in Property Dispute with Wife — Order 18 Rules 1 and 2 CPC Interpreted. Husband Must Prove His Case as He Would Be Defeated if No Evidence Is Given, Given His Admission of Wife's Payment.

The case involves a property dispute between husband and wife. The wife filed a petition seeking a declaration that she is the sole owner of one of tw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Quia Timet Action for Passing Off Based on Distinctive Bottle Shape of Vodka. Shape of a bottle can be protected as a trademark or get-up if it has acquired distinctiveness and is likely to cause confusion.

The plaintiff, Gorbatschow Wodka KG, a German company manufacturing Vodka, filed a quia timet action against John Distilleries Limited alleging that t...