Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Interim Injunction in Trademark and Copyright Infringement Suit Due to Suppression of Material Facts. Plaintiff's Conduct of Suppressing Prior User and Earlier Litigation Disentitles It to Equitable Relief Under Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Copyright Act, 1957.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 87
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The suit was filed by ITC Limited against NTC Industries Ltd. for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off in relation to cigarettes and tobacco products. ITC claimed infringement of its registered trademarks 'GOLD FLAKE', 'HONEY DEW', and 'HONEY DEW SMOOTH', and copyright in the artistic work 'GOLD FLAKE KINGS RED'. ITC obtained an ex parte ad-interim order on 7th May 2014, which was later vacated by consent on 17th July 2014. The present application was limited to infringement of trademark and copyright. NTC opposed the application, alleging that ITC had suppressed material facts, including prior use of 'GOLD FLAKE' by other manufacturers and ITC's own conduct in earlier litigation. The court heard extensive arguments from both sides. The court found that ITC had indeed suppressed material facts, such as the existence of prior users of the mark 'GOLD FLAKE' and its own earlier litigation where it had taken a different stance. The court held that a party seeking equitable relief must come with clean hands and cannot suppress material facts. Consequently, the court dismissed ITC's application for interim injunction, holding that ITC was not entitled to any equitable relief due to its conduct. The court did not grant any interim relief to ITC.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Interim Injunction - Suppression of Material Facts - Plaintiff sought interim injunction for trademark and copyright infringement - Defendant alleged suppression of prior user by third parties and plaintiff's own conduct - Court held that plaintiff guilty of material suppression and unclean hands, disentitling it to equitable relief - Held that a party seeking equity must come with clean hands and cannot suppress material facts (Paras 1-10).

B) Trademark Law - Infringement - Prior User - Plaintiff claimed infringement of 'GOLD FLAKE' and 'HONEY DEW' marks - Defendant contended that 'GOLD FLAKE' is a common descriptive term used by many manufacturers - Court noted that plaintiff suppressed existence of prior users and its own earlier litigation - Held that suppression of prior user is a material fact that disentitles plaintiff to interim relief (Paras 11-20).

C) Copyright Law - Artistic Work - Infringement - Plaintiff claimed copyright in label 'GOLD FLAKE KINGS RED' - Defendant argued that label is not original and plaintiff suppressed prior registrations - Court found that plaintiff failed to disclose material facts regarding copyright ownership - Held that suppression of facts regarding copyright registration disentitles plaintiff to interim injunction (Paras 21-27).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an interim injunction in a suit for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off, given allegations of suppression of material facts and unclean hands.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court dismissed the plaintiff's application for interim injunction, holding that the plaintiff is guilty of material suppression and unclean hands, and therefore not entitled to any equitable relief.

Law Points

  • Suppression of material facts
  • unclean hands
  • equitable relief
  • interim injunction
  • trademark infringement
  • copyright infringement
  • passing off
  • prior user
  • balance of convenience
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015:BHC-OS:12338

Notice of Motion No. 662 of 2014 in Suit No. 431 of 2014

2015-09-29

G.S. Patel, J.

2015:BHC-OS:12338

Mr. Ravi Kadam, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Sanjay Kher & Ms. Tanmayee Rajadhyaksha i/b M/s. Nanu Hormusjee & Co. for Plaintiff; Mr. Janak Dwarkadas, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Amit Jamsandekar & Mr. Aditya Thakkar, i/b Gordhandas & Fozdar for Defendant

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Suit for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off.

Remedy Sought

Plaintiff sought interim injunction restraining defendant from using marks 'GOLD FLAKE' and 'HONEY DROP' and infringing copyright in label 'GOLD FLAKE KINGS RED'.

Filing Reason

Plaintiff alleged that defendant's use of 'GOLD FLAKE' and 'HONEY DROP' infringed its registered trademarks and copyright.

Previous Decisions

Ex parte ad-interim order granted on 7th May 2014; vacated by consent on 17th July 2014.

Issues

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an interim injunction for trademark and copyright infringement. Whether the plaintiff suppressed material facts and is guilty of unclean hands.

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff argued that it is the registered owner of trademarks 'GOLD FLAKE', 'HONEY DEW', and 'HONEY DEW SMOOTH' and copyright in label 'GOLD FLAKE KINGS RED', and that defendant's use of 'GOLD FLAKE' and 'HONEY DROP' infringes its rights. Defendant argued that plaintiff suppressed material facts, including prior use of 'GOLD FLAKE' by other manufacturers and plaintiff's own conduct in earlier litigation, and that plaintiff is not entitled to equitable relief due to unclean hands.

Ratio Decidendi

A party seeking equitable relief must come with clean hands and cannot suppress material facts. Suppression of prior user and earlier litigation disentitles the plaintiff to interim injunction.

Judgment Excerpts

First, mea culpa: I heard Counsel on both sides at some length almost a year ago. I reserved judgment. Other matters intervened since, and I somehow lost sight of this case. The suit is an action in trade mark and copyright infringement combined with a cause of action in passing off. Mr. Dwarkadas’s submissions, which I will consider in detail later in this judgment, were that ITC is guilty of material suppression, especially in relation to prior user by other manufacturers and traders; that ITC’s conduct lacks all...

Procedural History

Plaintiff filed suit on 7th May 2014 and obtained ex parte ad-interim order. On 17th July 2014, the ad-interim order was vacated by consent. The present notice of motion was heard and judgment reserved on 10th October 2014, and pronounced on 29th September 2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Trade Marks Act, 1999:
  • Copyright Act, 1957:
  • Letters Patent (Bombay): Clause XIV
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Directs Timely Disposal of Advance Ruling Application under SGST Act. "Authority bound to decide applications on merits despite subsequent pre-show cause notice."
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Interim Injunction in Trademark and Copyright Infringement Suit Due to Suppression of Material Facts. Plaintiff's Conduct of Suppressing Prior User and Earlier Litigation Disentitles It to Equitable Relief Unde...