Search Results for "Section 31-A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Section 31-A"

174 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 174 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interest on Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Possession Prior to Notification Does Not Bar Interest Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that interest under Section 28 is payable from the date of taking possession, even if possession precedes the Section 4(1) notification.

18 Apr 2016

The case arises from a land acquisition matter where the State of Maharashtra appealed against the Reference Court's award of interest on enhanced com...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapsed Land Acquisition Proceedings Under 2013 Act. Petitioners Claimed Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Compliance with Provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interest on Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Possession Prior to Notification Does Not Bar Interest Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that interest under Section 28 is payable from the date of taking possession, regardless of whether possession precedes the Section 4(1) notification.

18 Apr 2016

The case arises from a land acquisition proceeding where the State of Maharashtra appealed against the Reference Court's award of interest on enhanced...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of NA Permission as Arbitrary and Mala Fide. Tahsildar's Order Set Aside for Being Passed at Behest of Third Party Despite Adverse Civil Court Decrees.

27 Jan 2022

The petitioner, a 61-year-old widow, challenged the order dated 04.03.2015 passed by the Tahsildar, Newasa, cancelling the Non-Agricultural (NA) permi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Occupancy Certificate and Refund of Security Deposit in CIDCO Development Dispute. Court holds that the developer failed to comply with development control regulations and that the petition was not maintainable due to disputed facts and alternative remedies.

27 Sep 2019

The petitioners, La'BuilDe Associates and its managing partner Bhagvanji Raiyani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Commercial Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act — Petitioner Contends Award Ignores Contractual Back-to-Back Payment Clause. Award of Rs.25.27 Crore Granted by Arbitrator Based on Letter Dated 15 November 2019 is Alleged to be Perverse and Patently Illegal, Ignoring That Payments Were Contingent on Receipts from Rural Development Department.

5 Dec 2025

The petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the Arbitral Award dated 11 July 2024. The Arbitral...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Divisional Commissioner's Order Declaring Group Leader of BJP Municipal Party for Lack of Jurisdiction. Commissioner Cannot Decide Group Leadership Under Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Act, 1986 as Power is Limited to Disqualification of Members.

12 Aug 2022

The petitioner, Bhagatram Ravalmal Balani, was elected as a councillor of the Jalgaon Municipal Corporation in 2018 on a BJP ticket. After the electio...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 7985 OF 2005.

25 Jan 2006

The petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged an order of the Second Labour Court, Thane, which allowed an applicatio...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Permits Landowners to Alienate Property Notified for Acquisition Under Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act Due to Medical Emergency. Right to Life Under Article 21 of Constitution Overrides Procedural Restrictions When Property is Sole Source of Livelihood.

27 Mar 2023

The petitioners, owners of land in Sy.No.207, Hulikunte Village, Doddaballapura Taluk, filed a writ petition seeking release of at least 50% ad interi...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Considers Writ Petitions Against Government Order Appointing Administrator for Murugha Mutt Under Articles 162 and 31A of Constitution; Appointment Follows Pontiff's Judicial Custody in Criminal Case

22 May 2023

The writ petitions, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenged a Government Order dated 13.12.2022 appointing a retired IAS offi...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)