WRIT PETITION NO.4520 OF 2014
30 Apr 2015The writ petitions challenged the constitutional validity and propriety of a notification dated January 29, 2014, issued by the Finance Department of ...
Search Results for "Rule 20(7)"
750 result(s) found
Found 750 result(s)
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Election Petition Challenging Election of Returned Candidate from 140-Bagepalli Assembly Constituency on Grounds of Non-disclosure of Assets. Petition Filed Under Sections 80, 81, 100, 101 and 123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, Alleges Suppression of Material Information in Nomination Affidavit.
16 Feb 2026The election petition was filed by Sri. C. Muniraju, an unsuccessful candidate of the Bharatiya Janata Party, challenging the election of Sri. S.N. Su...
- 47
High Court
- 64
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Partition Suit Appeal, Remands for Fresh Preliminary Decree — Co-sharer's Right to Partition Not Barred by Earlier Compromise or Subsequent Sales. The Court held that the right to partition is a continuing right and the suit was not barred by res judicata or compromise, and subsequent purchasers are bound by lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
15 Jan 2020The present appeals arise out of a suit for partition (Civil Suit No. 4406 of 2005) filed by the appellant, Rajinder Kaur, for partition of a property...
- 594
High Court
High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Order Condoning Delay in Land Revenue Appeal Due to Lack of Reasons and Insufficient Cause. Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 as Quasi-Judicial Authority Violated Natural Justice by Failing to Record Reasons for Condoning 13-Year Delay Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.
13 Mar 2026The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by Petitioner, a public listed company, challenging an order dated 8th April 2024 passed by the Additiona...
- 853
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging SFIO Investigation Order in Company Law Non-Compliance Case Involving Family Demerger Dispute. The Court considered whether order dated 6 May 2016 directing investigation into affairs of Singhal Enterprises Private Limited under Section 633 and Article 226 should be quashed amid ongoing litigation.
5 Oct 2016The writ petition was filed by majority shareholders of Singhal Enterprises Private Limited, a Kolkata-based sponge iron manufacturer, against the Add...
- 42
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Axis Bank's Application to be Joined as Party in Multiple Suits Against Orbit Corporation Ltd. — Bank's Right to Defend Its Mortgage Interest Recognized. The court held that a mortgagee bank has a right to be heard in suits for specific performance of agreements for sale of mortgaged properties, as its interest would be affected by any decree.
2 Aug 2017The judgment concerns multiple notices of motion filed by Axis Bank Limited seeking to be joined as a party in various suits filed by flat purchasers ...
- 74
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Land Dispute Case Due to Civil Nature and Lack of Criminal Intent. Criminal proceedings under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 IPC quashed as dispute was essentially civil and no criminal intent was made out.
16 Oct 2018The applicants, original accused persons, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of FI...
- 121
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Gift of Property by Company to Director's Husband Held Not to be Income, as Assessee's Objections Were Not Properly Considered.
6 Oct 2023The petitioner, Bakhtawar Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd., a closely held company, challenged a notice dated 30 March 2013 issued under Section 148 of the ...
- 48
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission's Power to Levy Interest Under Section 234B When No Interest Was Charged in Original Assessment. Interest under Section 234B(4) can only be increased or reduced if it was initially chargeable under the original assessment order.
2 Jul 2010The petitioner, Akbar Travels of India Pvt. Ltd., an IATA approved travel agent and money changer, filed returns for Assessment Years 2002-03 to 2006-...
- 71
