Bombay High Court Allows Axis Bank's Application to be Joined as Party in Multiple Suits Against Orbit Corporation Ltd. — Bank's Right to Defend Its Mortgage Interest Recognized. The court held that a mortgagee bank has a right to be heard in suits for specific performance of agreements for sale of mortgaged properties, as its interest would be affected by any decree.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment concerns multiple notices of motion filed by Axis Bank Limited seeking to be joined as a party in various suits filed by flat purchasers (Padma Ashok Bhatt, Om Project Consultants and Engineers Limited, Madhav Prasad Aggarwal, Manisha Saraf, Niraj Dilip Jiwrajka) against M/s. Orbit Corporation Ltd. and others. The suits sought specific performance of agreements for sale and injunctions against the developer. Axis Bank claimed that the subject properties were mortgaged to it and that any decree passed in the suits would affect its mortgagee rights. The bank argued that it had a right to be heard before any order affecting its interest was passed. The plaintiffs opposed the applications, contending that the bank was not a necessary party. The court, after hearing submissions, held that the bank, as a mortgagee, has a right to be heard and to protect its interest. The court allowed the bank's applications for joinder under Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, noting that the bank's presence would enable it to present its case and ensure that no order is passed behind its back. The court directed that the bank be added as a defendant in each suit and be permitted to file its written statement. The judgment emphasizes the principle of natural justice and the right of a person whose interest may be affected by a decree to be heard.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Joinder of Parties - Right to be Heard - Order I Rule 10, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Mortgagee bank sought to be joined as a party in suits filed by flat purchasers against developer for specific performance and injunction - Court held that the bank has a right to be heard to protect its mortgage interest, as any decree affecting the property would impact the bank's security - Allowed the bank's applications for joinder (Paras 1-16).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether Axis Bank, as a mortgagee, has a right to be heard and be joined as a party in suits filed by purchasers against the developer, where the subject property is mortgaged to the bank.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the applications of Axis Bank to be joined as a party in each of the suits. The bank is to be added as a defendant and permitted to file its written statement.

Law Points

  • Right to be heard
  • Mortgagee's interest
  • Joinder of parties
  • Order I Rule 10 CPC
  • Natural justice
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (07) 116

Notice of Motion No.7 of 2017 in Suit No.8 of 2017 and connected matters

2017-08-02

Mr.Satyan N. Vaishnawa, Ms.Nupur Mukherjee, Ms.Kirtika Kothari, Mr.S. Pathak, Ms.Ankita Singhania, Mr.Ashutosh Khaitan, Mr.Adhish Sharma, Mr.Sarosh Bharucha, Mr.Maneck Mulla, Mr.Danesh Mehta, Ms.Rajani Iyer, Mr.Karl Tamboly, Mr.Bhalchandra R. Palav, Mr.Bhavik Lalan

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suits for specific performance of agreements for sale and injunction against developer, with mortgagee bank seeking joinder as party.

Remedy Sought

Axis Bank sought to be joined as a party in the suits to protect its mortgage interest.

Filing Reason

Axis Bank claimed that the subject properties were mortgaged to it and that any decree in the suits would affect its security interest.

Issues

Whether Axis Bank, as a mortgagee, has a right to be heard and be joined as a party in suits filed by purchasers against the developer.

Submissions/Arguments

Axis Bank argued that it has a mortgage over the properties and any decree would affect its rights, thus it should be heard. Plaintiffs opposed, contending that the bank is not a necessary party to the suits.

Ratio Decidendi

A mortgagee has a right to be heard in proceedings where the mortgaged property is the subject matter, as its interest may be affected by the decree. Order I Rule 10 CPC allows joinder of any person whose presence is necessary for the complete and final adjudication of the dispute.

Judgment Excerpts

The bank has a right to be heard before any order is passed which may affect its interest. The bank is a necessary party to the suit as its mortgage interest is directly involved.

Procedural History

Multiple notices of motion were filed by Axis Bank in various suits seeking joinder as a party. The court heard all matters together and passed a common order.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order I Rule 10
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Axis Bank's Application to be Joined as Party in Multiple Suits Against Orbit Corporation Ltd. — Bank's Right to Defend Its Mortgage Interest Recognized. The court held that a mortgagee bank has a right to be heard in suits...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for MIHAN Project — Upholds Validity of Notifications Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court holds that substantial compliance with Section 4(1) and Section 6 is sufficient and...