Search Results for "Representation disposal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Representation disposal"

2121 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2121 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Ordinary Leave Matter Due to Infructuous Nature of Claim. Writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking direction to consider representation for ordinary leave, is dismissed as the representation was already considered and leave granted; the court refuses to dispense with the escort condition as not appropriate.

24 Mar 2025

The petitioner, sister of a convict, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the pri...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs TASMAC to Consider Representation for Closure of Retail Shop and Removal of Encroachment on Public Pathway. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, warranting a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

6 Jan 2025

The petitioner, S. Aruljothi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar to Consider Petitioner's Representation for Inclusion of Name in Patta in Ancestral Property Case. Court Orders Consideration of Representation Within Eight Weeks Without Expressing Opinion on Merits.

30 Jan 2025

The petitioner, V. Pushpavalli, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the responde...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Releases Detainee in Preventive Detention Case Due to Inordinate Delay in Consideration of Representation. State Government's Failure to Expeditiously Consider and Independently Assess Detenu's Representation Before Advisory Board Reference Violated Article 22(5) of the Constitution and Section 7 of Preventive Detention Act, 1950.

5 Nov 1969

The Supreme Court addressed a habeas corpus petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the preventive detention of the petitioner under...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Statutory Authority to Consider Representation on Encroachment Removal in Writ of Mandamus. Non-consideration of Representation Amounts to Dereliction of Duty Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

9 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Muthammal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court seek...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation. Violation of Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India renders detention order invalid.

22 Dec 2014

The petitioner, father of the detenu Chirag D. Shah, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a preven...

High Court

High Court of Andhra Pradesh Reviews Habeas Corpus Challenge to Preventive Detention Order Under Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1986. Court Considers Whether Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation and Lack of Bail Satisfaction Violate Article 22(5) of Constitution of India and Established Detention Law.

1 Jul 2026

The petitioner, wife of detenu Cheemparthi Fakruddin, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of habeas co...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation for Shifting TASMAC Liquor Shop from Temple Land. Court orders District Collector to decide on representation within three months without expressing views on merits.

30 Jan 2025

The petitioner, S. Kodieswaran, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar to Consider Representation on Encroachment Allegation in Sathanur Village. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, warranting direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

30 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Palanivelu, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court see...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation on Encroachment Allegations in Public Street. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, warranting direction under Article 226 of Constitution of India to consider representation within three months.

7 Jan 2025

The petitioner, M.Nallathambi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court seek...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)