Search Results for "Rape Conviction"

1023 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1023 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 read with Section 3 of POCSO Act set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The case involves three appellants: Ganesh @ Gorakh Tatyarao Jadhav (original accused No. 1), Muskan w/o Shaikh Rashid @ Rafiq (original accused No. 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age. Conviction under Sections 366 and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Essential Ingredients Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Abhang s/o Laximan Jadhav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Udgir, for offences under Sections 366 and 376 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Rape and Atrocities Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Prosecution Failed to Prove Rape Under Section 376 IPC and Caste-Based Insult Under SC/ST Act Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Rangnath Dagadu Shinde by the Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar in Sessions Case No. 177 of 1993. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Prosecutrix's delayed report and contradictions with medical evidence led to benefit of doubt to accused under Sections 342, 323, 376 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Dnyaneshwar Shravan Rathod, who was charged under Sections 342, 323, and 376 of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Father in Rape of Minor Daughter. Testimony of victim and medical evidence sufficient to sustain conviction under Section 376(2)(i) and (n) IPC for repeated rape of 15-year-old daughter by father.

The appellant, Sayyad Shabbir Sheikh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vasai, for offences under Section 376(2)(i) and (n), 323, and 50...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(1) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Vijay Tulshiram Bangar (accused no.1) and Anil Sahadeo Wankhede (accused no.2) against their convictio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 168 OF 2011

The criminal appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 23-2-2010 (or 23-2-2011) passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, in S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case of Deaf and Dumb Girl Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 376 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Laxman Narayan Jadhav, was convicted by the 4th Ad hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Buldhana, for the offence of rape under Section 376 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Rape of Minor in Rape Case — Conviction Based on Consistent Testimony of Victim and Medical Evidence. Appellant convicted under Section 376(2)(f) IPC for raping an 11-year-old girl; appeal dismissed as prosecution proved case beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Mohamed Farid Jafer Shaikh, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Sections 376(2)(f), 342, 363 read w...