Search Results for "No-Confidence Motion"

104 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 104 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Non-Service of Notice. Service of Notice on Son Not Valid Service Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioner, Smt. Sampada Vilas Mahargude, was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Talewadi, Taluka Atpadi, District Sangli. A motion of no confidence w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Notice of No-Confidence Cannot Be Withdrawn Once Given; Bar of Two Years Applies to Moving of Motion, Not Notice.

The petitioner, Vijay Ramdas Kokate, was the Sarpanch of a Gram Panchayat. On 8th February 2022, a notice of no-confidence was given to the Tahsildar ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion. Disqualification under Section 14(1)(j-1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 applies only to candidates for election, not to sitting members, and the no-confidence motion was validly passed.

The Petitioner, Vitthal Rajaram Shitole, was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Koregaonmul. He filed a writ petition challenging a no-confidence motion p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Vice-President for Violation of Natural Justice and Procedural Rules under Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965. Failure to allow the petitioner to speak and absence of proper proposal and seconding rendered the motion invalid.

The petitioner, Shailesh Gabhane, was the Vice-President of Nagar Panchayat, Mohadi, elected on 19.01.2022. On 20.12.2022, nine elected councillors su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Collector's Order Invalidating No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Gram Panchayat Dispute. Rules Under Bombay Village Panchayats Act Held Directory, Not Mandatory, and Substantial Compliance Sufficient.

The petitioner, Prajakta Prabhakar Kadu, the Up-Sarpanch of Gram-Panchayat Shedsai, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Violation of Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Motion Held Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure

The petitioner, Smt. Kalimun Balaso Nadaf, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Udgaon. Respondent Nos. 3 to 11 submitted resignations from the post of m...