Search Results for "Madras High Court"

199 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 199 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petitioners in Police Act Case Upholding Regulation of Processions. Police Authority Under Section 30 of Police Act, 1861, to Deny Permission for Route March Based on Law and Order Concerns Was Upheld as Justified.

The dispute originated from a batch of 49 writ petitions filed by office bearers of the Rashtriya Swayam Sevak Sangh (RSS) before the Madras High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Management's Appeal in Service Regulation Dispute Over Annual Increment. Employees Entitled to Increment Earned One Day Before Retirement Under Regulation 40(1) of Karnataka Electricity Board Employees Service Regulations, 1997, as They Completed Required Service Period.

The dispute arose between the management of KPTCL and its employees regarding the entitlement to an annual increment earned one day prior to retiremen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Intervenor's Application for Clarification of Earlier Judgment in Unrelated CBI Enquiry Matter. Applicant Lacked Locus Standi as Allegations Pertained to Separate Contractual Force Majeure Issue Under COVID-19, Unconnected to Prior Case Between Different Parties.

The Supreme Court dealt with a miscellaneous application filed by an intervenor seeking clarification of its earlier order dated 03.08.2022 in Crimina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pension Benefits Case Involving Caste Certificate Verification. Court Sets Aside High Court Orders and Directs Release of Post-Retirement Benefits Due to 19-Year Delay and Violation of Natural Justice in Verification Proceedings.

The Supreme Court heard an appeal against the Madras High Court's dismissal of a writ petition and review application concerning denial of post-retire...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Wildlife Declaration Case Due to Time-Barred Application. Time Limit Under Rule 4(2) of Declaration of Wild Life Stock Rules, 2003 is Mandatory and Cannot Be Relaxed, as Per Section 40A of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972.

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the time limit for filing declarations under wildlife protection laws. The appellant, in possession of a de...