Search Results for "Land Disposal Policy"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Land Disposal Policy"

974 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 974 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to 38-Year Delay and Laches. Consent terms entered by petitioner's father in 1966 binding on petitioner; possession taken in 1972; petition filed in 2010 without explanation.

17 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Abhay V. Khinvasara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land bearing ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines the Use of Ready Reckoner in Fixing Market Value for Land Acquired Under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The Court Considers the Validity of a Government Circular and the Reliance on Stamp Rules, and Determines That Ready Reckoner Cannot Be the Sole Determinant of Market Value Under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

20 Sep 2005

The proceedings involved two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court arising from a land acquisition dispute. The land in question was C.S.No.649,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for BDA Layout. The petitions sought quashing of preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 under the Karnataka BDA Act, 1976 regarding Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout.

11 Jul 2014

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Regularisation of Irregular Allotment of Land for Commercial Complex in Navi Mumbai, Imposing Restitution of Rs. 100 Crore. The Court held that where irreversible economic and social consequences have crystallised over two decades, public interest may be better served by regularisation with full financial restitution rather than demolition.

1 Jan 2026

The case pertains to a challenge against the allotment of land by CIDCO to K. Raheja Corp. Private Limited (the Developer) for the construction of a s...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Appeals Filed Against Single Judge Order in Land Acquisition Matters Involving KIADB. Appeals Challenge Order Dated 04.07.2025 in Various Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners and Developers.

29 Jul 2026

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Premium Demand on Entire Land in ULC Repeal Case — Demand Must Be Limited to Vacant Land Only. The Court held that under the repealed Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, a premium demand for the entire land including built-up area is impermissible; only vacant land as per the exemption order can be subject to premium.

9 Aug 2023

The Petitioner, Modern Paints, a partnership firm, acquired land in Oshiwara, Mumbai, under a conveyance dated 12 June 1975. On 1 August 1977, it file...

High Court

KAHC010000842011_1

11 Jul 2014

The matter comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, listed under Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Revisits Land Allotment Dispute Between Project Affected Persons Under Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999 After Remand. The Court Determines the Validity of Deputy Collector's Orders Dated 02.01.2020 and 17.02.2020 on Merits After Supreme Court Set Aside Previous High Court Order.

26 Jul 2023

The dispute arose between two sets of project affected persons under the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999, both claiming ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment in Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. The Petitions, Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, Sought to Quash Preliminary Notification Dated 21.05.2008 Under Section 17(1) and (3) of BDA Act and Final Notification Dated 18.02.2010 Under Section 19(1).

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under the BDA Act and the Land Acquisition Act.

11 Jul 2014

A batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India came before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, presided...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)