Search Results for "Interest Act, 1978"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Interest Act, 1978"

1857 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1857 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Chamber Summons to Set Aside Abatement of Arbitration Petition and Condonation of Delay. Application Filed Under Order 22 Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to Bring Legal Representatives of Deceased Parties on Record.

15 Feb 2013

The Chamber Summons was filed under Order 22 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to set aside the abatement of Arbitration Petition N...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Oil Corporation in Kerosene Supply Contract Dispute. Arbitrator Had Rejected Limitation Defense Under Contractual Clause and Held Clause Not Void Under Section 28 of Indian Contract Act.

4 Mar 2015

The matter arose from an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the original respondent in the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contractor's Suit for Specific Performance and Allows Society's Counterclaim for Damages in Construction Dispute. Agreement dated 13th March 1978 held valid but not specifically enforceable due to mutual breaches and failure to prove readiness and willingness.

11 May 2012

The judgment concerns two cross-suits between M/s. Shanti Builders (a building contractor) and CIBA Industrial Workers' Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. (t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Constitutional Challenge to Service Tax on Advocates. The Levy Under Section 65(105)(zzzzm) of the Finance Act, 1994 is Challenged as Ultra Vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 265 of the Constitution.

15 Dec 2014

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Urban Improvement Trust's Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Acquisition Proceedings Upheld Despite Delay and Compensation Disputes. Notification under Section 52(1) of Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 Valid; Compensation Determined and Paid Lawfully.

10 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Urban Improvement Trust against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which had quashed the land...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Substitution of Assignee in Pending DRT Proceedings Under SARFAESI Act. Assignment of debt under Section 5 of SARFAESI Act entitles assignee to continue pending recovery proceedings without fresh filing, and amendment of cause title is permissible.

9 Aug 2010

The petitioner, Alpha and Omega Diagnostics India Ltd., challenged a common order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) which upheld the orde...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is Directory — District Forum Can Extend Time for Filing Reply Beyond 45 Days in Exceptional Circumstances. The 30-day period for filing reply commences from receipt of notice by the opposite party.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court Constitution Bench addressed two questions referred regarding Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The first quest...

High Court

Bombay High Court Pronounces Judgment in Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 295 Amendment and Demand for Unearned Income Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The Lead Petition Involved Assignment of Leasehold Rights and a Demand of Over Rs. 94 Crores, With the Petitioners Alleging the Retrospective Amendment Violated Articles 14 and 19(1)(g).

3 May 2018

The judgment pertained to a batch of four writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Ordinary O...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench adjudicates the limitation period for recovery of electricity charges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Conflicting Division Bench decisions on whether dues beyond two years can be recovered when not continuously shown as arrears are reconciled.

12 Mar 2019

The case originated from a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman regarding recovery of electricity dues for a period beyond ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Repeal of Karnataka Contract Carriages (Acquisition) Act, 1976 and Invalidates Delegation of Permit-Granting Power to Secretary. The State Legislature has plenary power to repeal a state Act under the Concurrent List without fresh Presidential assent, and the quasi-judicial function of granting permits under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 cannot be delegated to the Secretary of the Transport Authority.

1 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a batch of civil appeals arising from a common judgment of the Karnataka High Court dated 28 March 2011. The ap...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)